Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 19990707

Docket: A-480-93

Between:

                                        IN THE MATTER OF THE Income Tax Act

                                                              GÉRALD DOYON

                                                                                                                                          Appellant

                                                                        - and -

                                                    HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                     Respondent

                                    CERTIFICATE OF ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

I hereby certify that the costs of the respondent in the instant case were assessed and allowed in the amount of $1,932.67.

          (signed)

                                                                                                                                                           

                                                                                                                       JOHANNE PARENT       

                                                                                                             ASSESSMENT OFFICER    

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC

July 7, 1999


                                                                                                                               Date: 19990707

                                                                                                                            Docket: A-480-93

BETWEEN:

                                          IN THE MATTER of the Income Tax Act

                                                              GÉRALD DOYON

                                                                                                                                          Appellant

                                                                        - and -

                                                    HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                     Respondent

                                          ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

JOHANNE PARENT, ASSESSMENT OFFICER:

[1]         On June 22, 1999, Marie Bélanger and Yanick Houle, representing the respondent, and Marie-Josée Robert, representing the appellant in this matter, appeared before me.

[2]         The hearing for this assessment gave effect to the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal dated March 13, 1997, which dismissed the appeal with costs. The assessments for dockets A-480-93 and A-479-93 were heard together.

[3]         In her bill of costs, the respondent claimed the following amounts:

Item                 Assessable Service                        Column III/Units                   Amount requested

19                     Memorandum of fact and law                       5                                               500.00

22(a)                Counsel fee on hearing

of appeal

(2 units x 2 hours)                               4                                               400.00

25                     Services after judgment                                                       

not otherwise specified                     1                                               100.00

26                     Assessment of costs                                     3                                               300.00

GST (7%)                                                                                           91.00

QST (7.5%)                                                                                        97.50

[4]         Pursuant to the factors set out in Rules 409 and 400(3) of the Federal Court Rules, 1998 and the evidence on the record, the amounts claimed under items 19, 25 and 26 are allowed as claimed. Under item 22(a), the amount of time claimed is reduced to 1 1/2 hours in light of the actual hearing time before the Court of Appeal.

[5]         The respondent withdrew the amounts claimed to cover the goods and services tax (GST) and the Quebec sales tax (QST) during the hearing for the assessment.

[6]         Accordingly, the following amounts were awarded:

Item                 Assessable Service                        Column III/Units                   Amount requested

19                     Memorandum of fact and law                       5                                               500.00

22(a)                Counsel fee on hearing

of appeal

(2 units x 1 1/2 hours)                        3                                               300.00


25                     Services after judgment                                                       

not otherwise specified                     1                                               100.00

26                     Assessment of costs                                     3                                               300.00

[7]         The disbursements claimed under Tariff B for the photocopies of the respondent's memorandum and the case law are awarded on the basis of the evidence filed during the hearing for the assessment.

[8]         The disbursements claimed for service of the respondent's memorandum cannot be awarded as no supporting evidence for this claim was presented. During the hearing for the assessment, however, the respondent asked to amend her bill of costs in order to add costs related to service to the appellant of the appointment for assessment of the bill of costs, in the amount of $6.42. As the appellant did not object, the bill of costs is therefore amended accordingly and the disbursement allowed.

[9]         Thus, the total amount allowed for disbursements in this matter is $732.67.

[10]       Accordingly, the respondent's costs are allowed in the amount of $1,932.67. A certificate is hereby issued for this amount.

               

(signed)

                                                                                                                                                                                                            

                                                                                                                        JOHANNE PARENT        

                                                                                                              ASSESSMENT OFFICER    

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC


July 7, 1999

Certified true translation

M. Iveson


                  FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                               APPEAL DIVISION

Date: 19990707

Docket: A-480-93

Between:

IN THE MATTER of the Income Tax Act

GÉRALD DOYON

                                                                              Appellant

- and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                         Respondent

                                                                                                                                             

            ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

                                                                                                                                           


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

APPEAL DIVISION

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT FILE NO.: A-480-93

STYLE OF CAUSE:                        

IN THE MATTER of the Income Tax Act

GÉRALD DOYON

                                                                  Appellant

- and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                             Respondent

PLACE OF ASSESSMENT:                      Montréal, Quebec

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS OF J. PARENT, ASSESSMENT OFFICER

DATE OF REASONS:                      July 7, 1999

APPEARANCES:                 

Marie-Josée Robert                          for the appellant

Marie Bélanger /

Yanick Houle                                       for the respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

BROUILLETTE, CHARPENTIER, FOURNIER

Montréal, Quebec                              for the appellant

Department of Justice Canada                                for the respondent

Montréal, Quebec

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.