Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020417

Docket: A-665-99

Citation: 2002 FCA 142

BETWEEN:

DEKALB CANADA INC.

Appellant

- and -

AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA

Respondent

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

FRANÇOIS PILON

Assessment Officer

[1]                 This is an appeal from a Trial Division judgment which was dismissed with costs on January 8, 2001.

[2]                 Counsel for the respondent, Claude Morissette, filed his bill of costs on October 12, 2001, and asked that it be taxed without a personal appearance by the parties. As no written submissions have been made by the appellant within the specified deadlines, we will proceed to assess the respondent's bill.


[3]                 Counsel for the respondent claimed compensation for the following fees:

item 19 5 units

item 22(a)          2 units

item 25 1 unit

item 26 4 units

[4]                 These claims seem reasonable to me in the circumstances and will be allowed.

[5]                 The costs of printing, service and travel amount to $789.69. These costs will be allowed since they were proven in Lynne Lasalle's affidavit.

[6]                 The respondent's costs are accordingly assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,430.00 for fees and $789.69 for disbursements. A certificate will be issued in the amount of $2,219.69.

  

"François Pilon"

line

Assessment Officer

Halifax, Nova Scotia

April 17, 2002

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L.


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT FILE No.:                                                         A-665-99

BETWEEN:

DEKALB CANADA INC.

Appellant

- and -

AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA

Respondent

ASSESSMENT IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE

REASONS BY:                                                               François Pilon, Assessment Officer

PLACE OF ASSESSMENT:                                        Halifax, Nova Scotia

DATE OF REASONS:                                                 April 17, 2002

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Brouillette, Charpentier, Fortin                                   for the appellant

Montréal, Quebec

Morris Rosenberg                                                          for the respondent

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.