Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20060707

Docket: A-558-99

Citation: 2006 FCA 255

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellant

and

RACHEL SHILLING

Respondent

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

Charles E. Stinson

Assessment Officer

[1]                This appeal, from a decision of the Federal Court holding that the Respondent's 1995 and 1996 employment income was exempt from income tax pursuant to the Indian Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-5, s. 87, was allowed with costs. I issued a timetable for written disposition of the Appellant's bill of costs.

[2]                The Respondent did not file any materials in response to the Appellant's materials. My view, often expressed in comparable circumstances, is that the Federal Courts Rules do not contemplate a litigant benefiting by an assessment officer stepping away from a position of neutrality to act as the litigant's advocate in challenging given items in a bill of costs. However, the assessment officer cannot certify unlawful items, i.e. those outside the authority of the judgment and the tariff. I examined each item claimed in the bill of costs and the supporting materials within those parameters. There were items which might have attracted disagreement, but the amount claimed in total in the bill of costs is generally arguable within the limits of the award of costs as reasonable in the circumstances of this litigation. The Appellant's bill of costs is assessed and allowed as presented at $4,571.80.

"Charles E. Stinson"

Assessment Officer


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAME OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                           A-558-99

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

- and -

RACHEL SHILLING

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES

REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF COSTS:                     CHARLES E. STINSON

DATED:                                                                                  July 7, 2006

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

Mr. John Shipley

FOR APPELLANT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR APPELLANT

Reynolds, Dolgin

Ottawa, ON

FOR RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.