Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

     Date: 19971217

     Docket: A-555-96

CORAM:      PRATTE J.A.

         ROBERTSON J.A.

         GRAY D.J.

BETWEEN:

     FRANZ ROGER MARTIN

     Appellant

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Wednesday, December 17th, 1997.

Judgment delivered at Toronto, Ontario, Wednesday, December 17th, 1997.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:      PRATTE, J.A.


Date: 19971217


Docket: A-555-96

CORAM:      PRATTE J.A.

         ROBERTSON J.A.

         GRAY D.J.

BETWEEN:

     FRANZ ROGER MARTIN

     Appellant

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

PRATTE J.A.:

[1]      This is an appeal from an order of the Trial Division dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Appeal Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board rejecting the appellant's application to reopen a previous decision of the Board vacating a stay of the removal order made against him.

[2]      The question that was certified by the judge of first instance as being of general importance for the purposes of this appeal was formulated as follows:

                      "In deciding whether to reopen proceedings, may the Appeal Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board weigh, consider and evaluate the evidence?"                 

[3]      Both counsel agree that this question, if it is read literally, must be answered in the affirmative. Counsel for the appellant argued, however, that the question should be understood as referring to the manner in which the Board weighed and assessed the evidence in this case. Assuming that the questions must be given that interpretation, we are all of opinion that the Board made no reviewable error in its evaluation of the evidence and in concluding that it was not sufficient to warrant a reopening of the matter.

[4]      The appeal will be dismissed.

"Louis Pratte"

J.A.

                  FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET:                      A-555-96

STYLE OF CAUSE:              FRANZ ROGER MARTIN

                         - and -

                         THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                         & IMMIGRATION

            

DATE OF HEARING:              DECEMBER 17, 1997

PLACE OF HEARING:              TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:      PRATTE, J.A.

Delivered at Toronto, Ontario

on Wednesday, December 17, 1997

APPEARANCES:                 

                         Ms. Barbara Jackman

                             For the Appellant

                         Ms. Marie-Louise Wcislo

                             For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:         

                         Jackman, Waldman & Associates

                         281 Eglinton Avenue East

                         Toronto, Ontario

                         M4P 1L3

                    

                             For the Appellant

                

                         George Thomson

                         Deputy Attorney General

                         of Canada

                             For the Respondent                 


                                             FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
                                             Date: 19971217
                                             Docket: A-555-96
                                             BETWEEN:
                                             FRANZ ROGER MARTIN
                                                  Appellant
                                             -and-
                                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
                                             & IMMIGRATION
                                                  Respondent
                                            
                                             REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
                                            
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.