Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20011017

Docket: A-393-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 307

CORAM:        LINDEN J.A.

EVANS J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                                       GARY SAUVE

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                            Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 17, 2001.

                    Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 17, 2001.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:                                                                               SHARLOW J.A.


Date: 20011017

Docket: A-393-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 307

CORAM:        LINDEN J.A.

EVANS J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                                       GARY SAUVE

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                                        REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(delivered from the Bench on October 17, 2001)

SHARLOW J.A.

[1]                 In view of the plaintiff's unjustified failure to comply with the order of Mr. Justice Dubé issued on November 3, 1999, after the first status review, there is no basis for interfering with the discretionary decision of Mr. Justice McKeown to dismiss the action after the second status review commenced on March 30, 2000. The appeal will be dismissed with costs.

"K. Sharlow"

J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.