Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020612

Docket: A-244-00

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 250

                                              IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX ACT

                     AND IN THE MATTER of an Assessment or Assessments by the Minister of

                  National Revenue under the Income Tax Act, Canada Pension Plan, Employment

                                      Insurance Actand Unemployment Insurance Act against:

                                                                    James Lorne Weber

                                                              707, 1100 - 8th Avenue SW

                                                              Calgary, Alberta T2P 3T9

                      AND IN THE MATTER OF The Civil Enforcement Act, S.A. 1994, c. C-10.5;

                                 AND IN THE MATTER OF a seizure made on August 6, 1999.

BETWEEN:

                                                            JAMES LORNE WEBER

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                              - and -

                             HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA AS

                      REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                               ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

Charles E Stinson

Assessment Officer


[1]                 A copy of these Reasons filed today in Court file ITA-6261-99 applies there accordingly. The Trial Division dismissed the Appellant's motion for a stay for an Order confirming the execution process to satisfy a tax debt and awarded costs to the Crown. The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the Appellant's appeal thereof and dismissed two interlocutory motions by the Appellant, all with costs to the Respondent. As well, the Federal Court of Appeal awarded costs of an adjournment to the Respondent. I issued a timetable for written disposition of the Crown's bill of costs in each Division. The Appellant did not respond.

[2]                 The Federal Court Rules, 1998, do not contemplate a litigant, having notice of an assessment of costs and failing to participate, benefiting by an assessment officer stepping away from a position of neutrality to act as the litigant's advocate in challenging given items in a bill of costs. However, the assessment officer cannot certify unlawful items, i.e. those outside the authority of the judgment and the tariff. I examined each item claimed in the bills of costs and the supporting materials within those parameters. There were items for services of counsel which might have attracted disagreement, but the amounts claimed in total in the bills of costs are arguable within the limits of the awards of costs. The bill of costs of the Respondent in A-244-00 is assessed and allowed as presented at $2,105.30. The bill of costs of the Appellant in ITA-6261-99 is assessed and allowed as presented at $770.00.

  

(Sgd.) "Charles E. Stinson"

    Assessment Officer

  

Vancouver, B.C.

June 12, 2002


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                 APPEAL DIVISION

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

  

DOCKET:                                             A-244-00

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX ACT

  

BETWEEN:

JAMES LORNE WEBER

                                                                                                                                                         Appellant

                                                                              - and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF

CANADA AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER

OF NATIONAL REVENUE

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

  

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF PARTIES

  

REASONS BY:                                   CHARLES E. STINSON

DATED:                                                JUNE 12, 2002

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

Morris Rosenberg                                                                           for Respondent

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.