Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

     A-138-96

CORAM:      DENAULT, J.A.

         LINDEN, J.A.

         ROBERTSON, J.A.

Between:

     MARIA ELSIE FALCONAR

     Plaintiff

     - and -

     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

     Defendant

Heard at Vancouver, BC on September 5, 1997

Reasons delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, BC

on September 5, 1997

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: DENAULT, J.A.

     A-138-96

CORAM:      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DENAULT

         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LINDEN

         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBERTSON

Between:

     MARIA ELSIE FALCONAR

     Plaintiff

     - and -

     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

     Defendant

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

     (Delivered from the Bench at

     Vancouver, B.C. on September 5, 1997)

DENAULT, J.A.

     In the present case, we are all of the view that the Umpire improperly substituted his opinion for that of the Board of Referees without identifying any error of law or erroneous finding of fact made in a perverse or capricious manner. The Umpire should have followed the test established by this Court in Roberts1 and in McCarthy2.

     The Umpire thereby committed an error of law. His decision must be set aside and the matter referred back to the Chief Umpire or his designate for reconsideration on the basis that the Board of Referees had evidence before it upon which it could decide as it did.

                             (Sgd.) "Pierre Denault"

                                 J.A.

September 5, 1997

Vancouver, British Columbia

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

STYLE OF CAUSE:          MARID ELSIE FALCONAR

                     - and -

                     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

COURT NO.:              A-138-96

PLACE OF HEARING:          Vancouver, BC

DATE OF HEARING:          September 5, 1997

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: DENAULT, J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:      LINDEN, J.A.

                 ROBERTSON, J.A.

DATED:                  September 5, 1997

APPEARANCES:

     Ms. Carol Rosset              for Plaintiff

     Ms. Brenda Carbonell          for Defendant

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

     Legal Services Society of B.C.      for Plaintiff

     Vancouver, BC

     George Thomson              for Defendant

     Deputy Attorney General of Canada


__________________

1      Roberts et al. v. Canada Employment and Immigration Commission (1985), 60 N.R. 349

2      Canada (A.G.) v. McCarthy (1994), 174 N.R. 28

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.