Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020116

Docket: A-573-01

Neutral citation: 2002FCA17

Present:           SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                 BARTON NO-TILL DISK INC. and FLEXI-COIL LTD.

                                                                                                                                                     Appellants

                                                                                 and

                                                    DUTCH INDUSTRIES LTD. and

THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

                                                                                                                                               Respondents

                                                                                   

                                           Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.

                                       Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, January 16, 2002

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                                                                         SHARLOW J.A.


Date: 20020116

Docket: A-573-01

Neutral citation: 2002FCA17

Present:           SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                 BARTON NO-TILL DISK INC. and FLEXI-COIL LTD.

                                                                                                                                                     Appellants

                                                                                 and

                                                    DUTCH INDUSTRIES LTD. and

THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

                                                                                                                                               Respondents

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER

SHARLOW J.A.

[1]                 On January 15, 2001 Malone J.A. made an order setting time limits for the filing of an amended notice of appeal. That automatically extended the time limits for subsequent steps that must be taken under the Federal Court Rules, 1998 to prepare the case for hearing. Rule 343(1), for example, must be read as requiring the agreement as to the contents of the appeal book to be filed within 30 days after the filing of the amended notice of appeal.


[2]                 The appellants submitted the agreement for filing within the stipulated time and it should have been accepted for filing.

[3]                 The agreement is to be accepted for filing as of this date. It should be noted that this will automatically extend the time limit for serving and filing the appeal book.

"K. Sharlow"

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION

NAMES OF SOLICITORS AND SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD

APPEAL FROM A DECISION OF THE TRIAL DIVISION OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA, DELIVERED MARCH 29, 2000, IN FILE NO.: T-967-00.

COURT FILE NO.: A-573-01

STYLE OF CAUSE: BARTON NO-TILL DISK INC. and FLEXI-COIL LTD. v. DUTCH INDUSTRIES LTD., AND THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

PLACE OF HEARING: OTTAWA, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 16, 2002 (pursuant to rule 369)

REASONS FOR ORDER BY: Sharlow, J.A.

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. Marcus T. Gallie Ms. Margaret H. McKay Ridout & Maybee

Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANT

Mr. Robert A. Kallio Mr. Cory J. Furman Furman & Kallio

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan FOR RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.