Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                    Date: 20050513

Docket: A-617-04

Citation: 2005 FCA 182

CORAM:        DESJARDINS J.A.

ROTHSTEIN J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

TAMERA CALLON

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                           Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on May 11, 2005.

                                    Judgment delivered at Toronto, Ontario, May 13, 2005.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:                                                                       DESJARDINS J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:                                                                                            ROTHSTEIN J.A.

                                                                                                                                  SHARLOW J.A.


                                                                                                                                  Date: 20050513

                                                                                                                              Docket: A-617-04

                                                                                                                     Citation: 2005 FCA 182

CORAM:        DESJARDINS J.A.

ROTHSTEIN J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

TAMERA CALLON

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                                    REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

DESJARDINS J.A.

[1]                This is an appeal of a decision of the Tax Court of Canada which dismissed the appellant's appeal of a reassessment by the Minister of National Revenue (the Minister). The reassessment, dated April 10, 2003, affirmed the appellant's tax liability, for the 2000 taxation year, on an amount of $30,000.00 as spousal support payment for the period July 1 to December 31, 2000, pursuant to section 56(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985 c.I (5th Supp.).

[2]                We cannot say that the Tax Court judge made any error that warrants the intervention of this Court.


[3]                The appellant explained the circumstances under which she formed the impression that she would not be made liable to pay income tax on that amount. She is asking for relief on compassionate grounds.

[4]                It is beyond the powers of this Court to grant such relief, just as it was beyond the powers of the Tax Court Judge, and the Minister to do so.

[5]                The respondent has left the matter of costs to the discretion of this Court.

[6]                This appeal should be dismissed. There should be no costs.

"Alice Desjardins"

                                                                                                                                                      J.A.                            

"I agree,

Marshall Rothstein"

"I agree,

Karen R. Sharlow"


                                                  FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                            NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                          A-617-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          TAMERA CALLON

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                    TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                      MAY 11, 2005

REASONS FOR

JUDGMENT BY:                              DESJARDINS J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:                    ROTHSTEIN J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

DATED:                                             MAY 13, 2005

APPEARANCES BY:                      

Tamera Callon                                    

                                                           FOR THE APPELLANT, ON HER OWN BEHALF

John Grant

Carol Shirtliff-Hinds

                                                           FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:         

Tamera Callon

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE APPELLANT, ON HER OWN BEHALF

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.