Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20010227

Docket: A-643-99

                                                                                                                   Citation: 2001 FCA 45

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

ROTHSTEIN J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                    VAL BRUNA HOLDINGS

Appellant

                                                                        - and -

                                                                            

                                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

                                                                        - and -

BETWEEN:

                                                       MAY DEVELOPMENTS

Appellant

                                                                        - and -

                                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

                                                                        - and -


BETWEEN:

                     STANDARD MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

Appellant

                                                                        - and -

                                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

                                                                        - and -

BETWEEN:

                                               NARDAQ INVESTMENTS INC.

Appellant

                                                                        - and -

                                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

                                 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                                                   (Delivered from the Bench at

                                           Vancouver, B.C. on February 27, 2001)

ROTHSTEIN, J.A.


[1]                 Despite the able argument of counsel for the appellants, we are unable to conclude that the learned Tax Court Judge erred in a manner that would justify interference by this Court with his interlocutory order. We have understood from counsel for the respondent that at trial the Minister does not intend to rely upon any documents that the Minister has refused to produce and that he does not intend to rely upon the "Turner Report" which makes reference to such documents . On this basis we are satisfied that the appellants will not be surprised at trial.

[2]                 The appeal will be dismissed with costs.

(Sgd.) "Marshall Rothstein"

         J.A.

February 27, 2001

Vancouver, British Columbia


                                               FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                       NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                           A-643-99

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           Val Bruna Holdings et al

v.

HMQ

PLACE OF HEARING:                                   Vancouver, British Columbia

DATE OF HEARING:                                     February 27, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY ROTHSTEIN, J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:                                   Décary, J.A. and Malone, J.A.

DATED:                                                             February 27, 2001

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Thomas M. Boddez                                      For the Appellant

Mr. Harry Erlichman                                             For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Thorsteinssons

Tax Lawyers

Vancouver, BC                                                    For the Appellant

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney

General of Canada                                                For the Respondent


Date: 20010227

Docket: A-643-99

                                                                                                                   Citation: 2001 FCA 45

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

ROTHSTEIN J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                    VAL BRUNA HOLDINGS

Appellant

                                                                        - and -

                                                                            

                                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

                                                                        - and -

BETWEEN:

                                                       MAY DEVELOPMENTS

Appellant

                                                                        - and -

                                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

                                                                        - and -


BETWEEN:

                     STANDARD MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

Appellant

                                                                        - and -

                                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

                                                                        - and -

BETWEEN:

                                               NARDAQ INVESTMENTS INC.

Appellant

                                                                        - and -

                                                 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on February 27, 2001

JUDGMENT delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia, on February 27, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                        Rothstein, J.A.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.