Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20181025


Docket: A-354-16

Citation: 2018 FCA 197

CORAM:

WEBB J.A.

NEAR J.A.

GLEASON J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

 

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

Appellant

 

 

and

 

 

GERBRO HOLDINGS COMPANY

 

 

Respondent

 

Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 25, 2018.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 25, 2018.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.

 


Date: 20181025


Docket: A-354-16

Citation: 2018 FCA 197

CORAM:

WEBB J.A.

NEAR J.A.

GLEASON J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

 

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

Appellant

 

 

and

 

 

GERBRO HOLDINGS COMPANY

 

 

Respondent

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 25, 2018).

WEBB J.A.

[1]  This is an appeal from the Judgment of Associate Chief Justice Lamarre of the Tax Court of Canada (2016 TCC 173) that allowed Gerbro Holdings Company’s appeal from the reassessment issued for its 2005 and 2006 taxation years.

[2]  We are not convinced that the Associate Chief Justice made any reviewable error in her thorough and detailed Reasons.

[3]  As a result, the appeal is dismissed with costs.

"Wyman W. Webb"

J.A.

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OR ORDER OF THE TAX COUR OF CANADA DATED JULY 22, 2016, CITATION NO. 2016 TCC 173, DOCKET NOS. 2012-739(IT)G AND 2012-4194(IT)G

DOCKET:

A-354-16

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. GERBRO HOLDINGS COMPANY

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Ottawa, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:

October 25, 2018

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.

NEAR J.A.

GLEASON J.A.

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

WEBB J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Caroline Ahn

Alexandra Humphrey

Jenna Clark

For The Appellant

Stéphane Eljarrat

John J. Lennard

Élisabeth Robichaud

For The Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Nathalie G. Drouin

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Appellant

Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

Montréal, Quebec

For The Respondent

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.