Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content




Date: 19990920


Docket: A-343-98

     IN RE THE CROWN LIABILITY AND PROCEEDINGS ACT, 1995

     s.3(a)

     IN RE THE FEDERAL COURT ACT, 1997

     s. 17(2)(d) and s. 17(5)(b)

CORAM:      DÉCARY J.A.

         ROBERTSON J.A.

         McDONALD J.A.

BETWEEN:

     ISTVAN SZEBENYI JR.

     GIZELLA SZEBENYI

     ISTVAN SZEBENYI SR.

    

     Appellants

     - and -


     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN


     Respondent


     Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Monday, September 20, 1999



     Judgment delivered orally from the Bench

     at Toronto, Ontario on Monday, September 20, 1999



REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:      ROBERTSON J.A.








Date: 19990920


Docket: A-343-98

     IN RE THE CROWN LIABILITY AND PROCEEDINGS ACT, 1995

     s.3(a)

     IN RE THE FEDERAL COURT ACT, 1997

     s. 17(2)(d) and s. 17(5)(b)

CORAM:      DÉCARY J.A.

         ROBERTSON J.A.

         McDONALD J.A.

BETWEEN:

     ISTVAN SZEBENYI JR.

GIZELLA SZEBENYI

ISTVAN SZEBENYI SR.


Appellants

    

     - and -




HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN


Respondent



     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

     (Delivered orally from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on

     Monday, September 20, 1999)

ROBERTSON J.A.:


[1]      This is an appeal from an order of the Trial Division allowing the respondent"s application to strike the appellants" statement of claim. No reasons were given for the order but it is common ground that the respondent had argued that the statement of claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action. We are all of the view that the appeal should be allowed.


[2]      The appellants, who are unrepresented, filed a statement of claim seeking damages flowing from the manner in which an application for landing was handled by Canadian immigration officials in Austria. The appellant Istvan Szevenyi Jr. is seeking to sponsor his parents, Gizella Szebenyi and Istvan Szebenyi Sr. The latter two appellants are or were residents of Hungary. Apparently no decision on the application for landing has been made as all of the requested medical information has not been received from the concerned appellants. It is the position of the appellant Gizella Szebenyi that she has been required to submit to several medical examinations despite the fact that initial results proved to be negative. There is also an allegation that immigration officials in Vienna have lost or destroyed confidential medical documents. Despite the broad nature of the allegations contained in the statement of claim it is apparent that the cause of action is founded in the negligent handling of the application for landing. That being said we are also of the view that the appellants should restrict their attack to that ground only and, therefore, should restrain themselves from pursuing the grounds of "discrimination", "professional misconduct", "vexation" and "violation of privacy".


[3]      The respondent takes the position that the substance of the statement of claim comes within the purview of an application for judicial review rather than an action. We disagree. The fact of the matter is that the appellants are seeking damages for the mishandling of the application for landing. More importantly, the appellants are not challenging a decision which has yet to be made with respect to that application. For this reason, Zubi v. Canada (1993), 71 F.T.R. 168 is not applicable.


[4]      Accordingly, the appeal should be allowed and the order of the Trial Division dated June 3, 1998 set aside. It follows that the respondent"s motion to strike the statement of claim must be dismissed. The appellants should be reimbursed for their costs both here and below.

                                     "J.T. Robertson"

     J.A.

              FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET:                      A-343-98

STYLE OF CAUSE:                  ISTVAN SZEBENYI JR.

                         GIZELLA SZEBENYI

                         ISTVAN SZEBENYI SR.

                                         Appellants

                                        

                         - and -

                         HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
                                         Respondent

DATE OF HEARING:              MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1999

PLACE OF HEARING:              TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:          ROBERTSON J.A.

Delivered at Toronto, Ontario

on Monday, September 20, 1999

APPEARANCES:                  Istvan Szebenyi Jr.

                                 For the Appellants in Person

                                    

                         Ms. Susan Nucci

        

                                 For the Respondent

                                

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:          Istvan Szebenyi Jr.

                         Gizella Szebenyi

                         Istvan Szebenyi Sr.

                         375 Trafalgar Avenue

                         Oshawa, Ontario

                         L1H 3V2

                                 For the Appellants in Person

                         Morris Rosenberg

                         Deputy Attorney General

                         of Canada

                                 For the Respondent


                         FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL



Date: 19990920


Docket: A-343-98


                         BETWEEN:

                         ISTVAN SZEBENYI JR.

                         GIZELLA SZEBENYI

                         ISTVAN SZEBENYI SR.

     Appellants

    

    

                         - and -

                         HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

     Respondent

    

    

    

                        

                         REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

                            

                        

    

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.