Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040126

Docket: 03-A-44

Citation: 2004 FCA 35

                                                                             

Present:           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PELLETIER

BETWEEN:

                                                          ALAIN LAURENDEAU

                                                                                                                                     Moving Party

                                                                           and

                                             ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                 Motion in writing decided without appearance of the parties.

                                     Order made at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 26, 2004.

REASONS FOR ORDER:                                                                                         PELLETIER J.A.


Date: 20040126

Docket: 03-A-44

Citation: 2004 FCA 35

Present:           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PELLETIER

BETWEEN:

                                                          ALAIN LAURENDEAU

                                                                                                                                     Moving Party

                                                                           and

                                             ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                                        REASONS FOR ORDER

PELLETIERJ.

[1]                This is a motion to reconsider by the moving party, although it does not comply with the Federal Court Rules, 1998, including rule 397, which sets a ten-day time limit for such motions.

[2]                What the moving party has not explained is why, for three years, he did nothing to move his appeal forward. The Federal Court Rules, 1998, specify not only what the moving party must do to proceed with his appeal, but also that the moving party shall comply with the Rules, even if he is representing himself:


122. Subject to paragraphs 152(2)(a) and 146(1)(b), unless the Court orders otherwise, a party not represented by a solicitor or a person authorized under rule 120 to represent a party shall do everything required, and may do anything permitted, to be done by a solicitor under these Rules.

122. Sous réserve des alinéas 152(2)a) et 146(1)b) et sauf ordonnance contraire de la Cour, la partie qui n'est pas représentée par un avocat ou la personne autorisée à représenter une partie conformément à la règle 120 accomplit elle-même tout ce que les présentes règles exigent d'un avocat ou permettent à ce dernier de faire.

[3]                When the moving party had heard nothing about his appeal after a reasonable period of time, he had to do what was necessary to move his case forward. It is the lack of effort on his part during the time that the respondent had not taken any collection action which has not been explained.

[4]                For these reasons, the application is dismissed with costs fixed by the Court at $150.

         "Denis Pelletier"        

J.A.

Certified true translation

Kelley A. Harvey, BA, BCL, LLB


                                                  FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                                                                             

                                                      SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                03-A-44

STYLE OF CAUSE:              ALAIN LAURENDEAU

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

MOTION IN WRITING EXAMINED WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES

REASONS FOR ORDER:                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PELLETIER

DATE OF REASONS:                            January 26, 2004

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

Alain Laurendeau                                    Representing himself

Pauline Leroux                                         For the respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Alain Laurendeau                                    Representing himself

Montréal, Quebec

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada      For the respondent

Montréal, Quebec

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.