Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                            Date: 20021120

                                                                                                                                         Docket: A-297-01

Québec, Quebec, November 20, 2002

CORAM:        CHIEF JUSTICE RICHARD

DÉCARY J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

STEVEN LEWIN

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

JUDGMENT

The appeal is dismissed with costs.

                       "John D. Richard"

line

                             Chief Justice

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, C.Tr., LL.L.


Date: 20021120

                                              Docket: A-297-01

Neutral Citation: 2002 FCA 461

CORAM:        CHIEF JUSTICE RICHARD

DÉCARY J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

STEVEN LEWIN

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Hearing held at Québec, Quebec, on November 20, 2002.

Judgment delivered from the bench at Québec, Quebec, on November 20, 2002.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:             NOËL J.A.


Date: 20021120

                                              Docket: A-297-01

Neutral Citation: 2002 FCA 461

CORAM:        CHIEF JUSTICE RICHARD

DÉCARY J.A.

NOËL J.A.

BETWEEN:

STEVEN LEWIN

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered at the hearing in Québec, Quebec

on November 20, 2002)

NOËL J.A.

[1]         This is an appeal from a decision handed down by Judge Tardif of the Tax Court of Canada (2001 TCJ 242) to the effect that the interest income generated by the term deposits held by the appellant in a Caisse populaire situated on a reserve were not covered by the tax exemption provided in paragraph 87(1)(b) of the Indian Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-6.


[2]         Notwithstanding certain factual distinctions, it is our opinion that the investment income at issue here, and in particular the way in which it was generated, raises the same question of principle as the one decided by this Court in Recalma v. Canada, [1998] 2 C.T.C. 403 (application for leave to appeal dismissed, No. 26668).

[3]         In our opinion, the judge below, in relying on that case, was properly apprised of the law, and we are unable to detect any error in the application of the relevant tests.

[4]         The appeal will therefore be dismissed with costs.

                          "Marc Noël"

line

                                  Judge

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, C.Tr., LL.L.


             FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

APPEAL DIVISION

Date: 20021120

                                                           Docket: A-297-01

Between:

STEVEN LEWIN

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

line

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

line


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

APPEAL DIVISION

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

FILE NO:                                               A-297-01

STYLE:                                                   STEVEN LEWIN

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

PLACE OF HEARING:                      Québec, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:                         November 20, 2002

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT:                                Noël J.A.

CONCURRING:                                 Chief Justice Richard

Décary J.A.

DATED:                                                 November 20, 2002

APPEARANCES:

Marc Watters                                                                     for the appellant

Sophie-Lyne Lefebvre                                        for the respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

GAGNÉ LETARTE                                                           for the appellant

Québec, Quebec

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                           for the respondent

Montréal, Quebec

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.