Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20030507

Docket: A-366-02

Citation: 2003 FCA 214

CORAM:        STONE J.A.

SEXTON J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                               MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND

GOVERNMENT SERVICES

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                     MAXSYS PROFESSIONALS & SOLUTIONS INC.

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                                   Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, May 7, 2003

                          Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, May 7, 2003

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                 SHARLOW J.A.


Date: 20030507

Docket: A-366-02

Citation: 2003 FCA 214

CORAM:        STONE J.A.

SEXTON J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                               MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND

GOVERNMENT SERVICES

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                     MAXSYS PROFESSIONALS & SOLUTIONS INC.

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                               (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, May 7, 2003

SHARLOW J.A.

[1]                 The Crown seeks to quash a decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal accepting as valid a complaint by the respondent relating to the procurement of professional services for the Department of National Defence.


[2]                 The issues argued before the CITT and this Court were essentially factual, relating to the quality of the respondent as a bidder. We agree with the respondent that the appropriate standard of review is patent unreasonableness.

[3]                 After considering the written and oral submissions of the parties, we are not persuaded that the CITT made any error that warrants the intervention of this Court.

[4]                 This application will therefore be dismissed with costs.

"K. Sharlow"

J.A.


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                             A-366-02

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND         GOVERNMENT SERVICES v. MAXSYS PROFESSIONALS & SOLUTIONS INC

                                                                                   

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Ottawa, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:                       May 7, 2003

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: (Stone, Sexton, Sharlow, JJA.)

RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY: (Sharlow, J.A.)


APPEARANCES:

Mr. David M. Attwater                                                                 FOR THE APPLICANT

Mr. Ronald D. Lunau.                                                                  FOR THE RESPONDENT

Ms. Carina Depellegrin

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Lang Michener                                                                               FOR THE APPLICANT

Ottawa, Ontario

Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP                                                   FOR THE RESPONDENT

Ottawa, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.