Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date:20010327

Docket:A-535-99

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 90

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

EVANS J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

XEROX CANADA LIMITED

Appellant

- and -

THE DEPUTY MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

Respondent

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Monday, March 26, 2001

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario,

on Monday, March 26, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                     EVANS J.A.                          


Date: 20010327

Docket: A-535-99

                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                              Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 90

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.                                           

EVANS J.A.

MALONE J.A.                        

BETWEEN:

                       XEROX CANADA LIMITED

                                                                                                                                  Appellant

                                                                       

                                                                   - and -                               

                                                                       

                                                                                                                                               

                         THE DEPUTY MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

                                                                                                                              Respondent

                               REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                                     (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario

                                                 on Monday, March 26, 2001)

EVANS J.A.


As this Court held in Minister of National Revenue (Customs and Excise) v. Schrader Automotive Inc. (1999), 240 N.R. 381, the standard of review to be applied to the Canadian International Trade Tribunal's interpretation of provisions of the Customs Tariff is unreasonableness. We have not been persuaded that it was unreasonable for the Tribunal to conclude that the film rolls for use in facsimile machines were, as the Deputy Minister had found, "typewriter or similar ribbons" and not, as the appellant maintained, "parts of a facsimile machine".

For the Tribunal to have taken into account the fact that the rolls were used up in a relatively short period of time and were discarded when the film was fully used was not unreasonable. Given the importance of the precise context of the Tribunal's interpretation of a tariff provision, other decisions of the Tribunal, and of United States courts, are of little assistance in demonstrating the unreasonableness of the Tribunal's conclusion in this case.

For these reasons, the appeal will be dismissed with costs.

"John M. Evans"

                                                                                                                                          J.A.                            

                                                                      


                                                                                   FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                    Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET:                                                        A-535-99

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                         XEROX CANADA LIMITED

                                                                                                                                  Appellant

                                                                   - and -                               

                                                                       

                                                                                                                                               

THE DEPUTY MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

                                                                                                                              Respondent

DATE OF HEARING:                          MONDAY, MARCH 26, 2001

PLACE OF HEARING:                                    TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT BY:                          EVANS J.A.                

Delivered at Toronto, Ontario on Monday, March 26, 2001

APPEARANCES:                                           Dalton Albrecht

For the Appellant

Robert Mackinnon

                                                                        For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:                       Fraser Milner Casgrain

Barristers & Solicitors

1 First Canadian Place

100 King Street West

Toronto, Ontario

M5X 1B2

For the Appellant

Morris Rosenberg


Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the Respondent


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Date: 20010327

Docket: A-535-99

BETWEEN:

XEROX CANADA LIMITED

                                                                                                                                  Appellant

                                                                   - and -                               

                                                                       

                                                                                                                                               

THE DEPUTY MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

                                                                                                                              Respondent

                                                                      

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF

THE COURT

                                                                      

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.