Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20011210

Docket: A-778-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 386

CORAM:       ROTHSTEIN J.A.

NOËL J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                             THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

                                                         OF CANADA

                                                                                                                        Appellant

                                                                and

                                                    MANJIT THIARA

                                                                                                                    Respondent

                               Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on December 10, 2001.

                   Judgment delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia, on December 10, 2001.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:                                                          ROTHSTEIN J.A.                     

CONCURRED IN BY:                                                                              NOËL J.A.

MALONE J.A.


Date: 20011210

Docket: A-778-00

Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 386

CORAM:       ROTHSTEIN J.A.

NOËL J.A.

MALONE J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                             THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

                                                         OF CANADA

                                                                                                                        Appellant

                                                                and

                                                    MANJIT THIARA

                                                                                                                    Respondent

                                             REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

         (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver on Monday, December 10, 2001)

ROTHSTEIN J.A.


[1]                 The decision of this Court in Canada (Attorney General) v. Haberman [2000] F.C.J. No. 1215 is dispositive of this appeal. Disputes over the number of hours of insurable employment are to be ruled on by an officer of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency authorized by the Minister to do so pursuant to subsection 90(1) of the Employment Insurance Act. The Board of Referees, the Umpire and therefore this Court, on appeal from the Umpire, are without jurisdiction to make such a ruling.

[2]                 The judicial review application will therefore be allowed, the decision of the Umpire set aside and the matter will be remitted to the Chief Umpire or his designate so that a new decision be entered on the basis that the Board of Referees and the Umpire were without jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

(Sgd.) "Marshall Rothstein"

J.A.


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                             A-778-00

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           AGC v. Manjit Thiara

                                                                                   

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Vancouver, BC

DATE OF HEARING:                       December 10, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT : ROTHSTEIN J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:                      NOËL, MALONE JJ.A.

DATED:                                                December 10, 2001

APPEARANCES:

Keitha Richardson                                                                          FOR THE APPELLANT

Manjit Thiara (Mr. Sabi Virk)                                                        FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Morris Rosenberg                                                                           FOR THE APPELLANT

Attorney General of Canada

Manjit Thiara                                                                                   FOR THE RESPONDENT

Surrey, BC

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.