Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20181002


Docket: A-51-18

Citation: 2018 FCA 176

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

NEAR J.A.

GLEASON J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

VICTORIA H.F. SCOTT, PH.D.

Appellant

and

MINISTER FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS REPRESENTING THE CANADIAN SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE

Respondent

Heard at St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, on October 2, 2018.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, on October 2, 2018.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

 


Date: 20181002


Docket: A-51-18

Citation: 2018 FCA 176

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

NEAR J.A.

GLEASON J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

VICTORIA H.F. SCOTT, PH.D.

Appellant

and

MINISTER FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS REPRESENTING THE CANADIAN SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, on October 2, 2018).

NADON J.A.

[1]  We are all agreed that the evidence which the appellant seeks to introduce in this appeal does not meet the applicable test. More particularly, it is our view that the evidence is not relevant to the question to be determined in the appeal.

[2]  Consequently, the appellant’s motion will be dismissed with costs.

"M Nadon"

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


Docket:

A-51-18

STYLE OF CAUSE:

VICTORIA H.F. SCOTT, PH.D. v. MINISTER FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS REPRESENTING THE CANADIAN SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador

 

DATE OF HEARING:

October 2, 2018

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

NEAR J.A.

GLEASON J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

NADON J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Victoria H.F. Scott

 

Representing herself

 

Jan Jensen

 

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Nathalie G. Drouin

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

 

For The Respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.