Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20070321

Docket: A-273-06

Citation: 2007 FCA 116

 

CORAM:       DÉCARY J.A.

                        SEXTON J.A.

                        EVANS J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

AGRI PACK

Appellant

and

THE COMMISSIONER OF THE CANADA CUSTOMS

AND REVENUE AGENCY

(NOW THE PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY)

 

Respondent

 

 

 

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on March 21, 2007.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 21, 2007.

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                    EVANS J.A.

 


Date: 20070321

Docket: A-273-06

Citation: 2007 FCA 116

 

CORAM:       DÉCARY J.A.

                        SEXTON J.A.

                        EVANS J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

AGRI PACK

Appellant

and

THE COMMISSIONER OF THE CANADA CUSTOMS

AND REVENUE AGENCY

(NOW THE PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY)

 

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on March 21, 2007)

EVANS J.A.

[1]               This matter was remitted to the Canadian International Trade Tribunal by this Court to determine whether Chapter Note 2(a) excludes the application of Tariff Item 6305.33 or why the Note does not apply. See Canada (Commissioner of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency) v. Agri Pack, 2005 FCA 414 at para. 51.

 

[2]               In a decision dated May 15, 2006, the Tribunal summarized its reasoning as follows:

[16] … Note 2 (a) to Chapter 63 only applies if goods fall in heading No. 56.08, the very issue that was before the Tribunal. Having found, under Rule 1 of the General Rules, that the imported goods did not fall in heading No. 56.08, it was the Tribunal’s view that Note 2(a) had no application to the instant case and, for that reason, the Tribunal did not deem it necessary to refer to it in its reasons.

 

[3]               We are not persuaded that this explanation is unreasonable. It is irrelevant that there may be another plausible explanation of the relevant provisions.

 

[4]               For these reasons, the appeal will be dismissed with costs.

 

“John M. Evans”

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

DOCKET:                                          A-273-06       

                                                    

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          AGRI  PACK v. THE COMMISSIONER OF THE

CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY

(NOW THE PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA

BORDER  SERVICES AGENCY)

 

                                                                                                  

PLACE OF HEARING:                    TORONTO, ONTARIO

 

 

DATE OF HEARING:                      MARCH 21, 2007

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF

THE COURT BY:                              (DÉCARY, SEXTON & EVANS JJ.A.)         

 

 

DELIVERED FROM THE

BENCH BY:                                       EVANS J.A.

 

 

APPEARANCES:              

 

Dennis A. Wyslobicky                          FOR THE APPELLANT

 

Alexander Gay                                     FOR THE RESPONDENT   

 

                                                                                  

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:  

 

Dennis A. Wyslobicky

Oakville, Ontario                                  FOR THE APPELLANT

 

 

 John H. Sims, Q.C.

 Deputy Attorney General of Canada    FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.