Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20070614

Docket: A-336-06

Citation: 2007 FCA 234

 

CORAM:       RICHARD C.J.

                        LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

                        NADON J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

VIATEUR MERCIER

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hearing held at Québec, Quebec, on June 13, 2007.

Judgment delivered at Québec, Quebec, on June 14, 2007.

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:                                                                 LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:                                                                                              RICHARD C.J.

                                                                                                                            NADON J.A.

 


 

Date: 20070614

Docket: A-336-06

Citation: 2007 FCA 234

 

CORAM:       RICHARD C.J.

                        LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

                        NADON J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

VIATEUR MERCIER

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

 

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

 

LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

 

[1]               The appellant was reassessed for the taxation years 2000, 2001 and 2002, using the net worth method. In a very thorough judgment, Mr. Justice Dussault of the Tax Court of Canada reviewed and analyzed each issue and, in the end, dismissed the appeals.

 

[2]                The outcome of the appeals in the Tax Court of Canada essentially turned on a question of credibility. Versions that were different, late, contradictory and new at the hearing, confused and inconsistent testimony, lack of evidence or of credible evidence to support the claims—such were the observations and findings of fact made by the Tax Court of Canada judge.

 

[3]               The appellant is asking us to review and set aside these findings that are based on the credibility of the documentary evidence that was adduced and the oral testimony. We cannot do so unless the said findings were made in a perverse or capricious manner, which is clearly not the case here.

 

[4]               For these reasons, the appeal will be dismissed with costs.

 

 

“Gilles Létourneau”

J.A.

 

 

 

“I concur.

            Richard C.J.”

 

 

“I concur.

            Nadon J.A.”

 

 

 

 

Certified true translation

Mary Jo Egan, LLB


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                                      A-336-06

 

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                      VIATEUR MERCIER  v.

                                                                        HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                Québec, Quebec

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                  June 13, 2007

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:             LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

 

CONCURRED IN BY:                                 RICHARD C.J.

                                                                        NADON J.A.

 

DATED:                                                         June 14, 2007

 

 

APPEARANCES

 

Viateur Mercier

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

Anne Poirier

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

 

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.