Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20070625

Docket: A-485-06

Citation: 2007 FCA 248

 

CORAM:       SEXTON J.A.

                        SHARLOW J.A.       

                        RYER J.A.    

                       

                                               

                       

 

BETWEEN:

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION AND

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellants

and

HASSAN SAMIMIFAR

Respondent

 

 

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on June 25, 2007.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on June 25, 2007.

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                RYER J.A


Date: 20070625

Docket: A-485-06

Citation: 2007 FCA 248  

 

CORAM:       SEXTON J.A.

                        SHARLOW J.A.       

                        RYER J.A.    

                       

                                               

                       

 

BETWEEN:

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION AND

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellants

and

HASSAN SAMIMIFAR

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on June 25, 2007)

 

RYER J.A.

[1]               This is an appeal from a decision of Justice Snider (2006 FC 1301) dismissing a motion by the Crown for summary judgment to dismiss a claim for damages that the respondent allegedly suffered as a result of a delay on the part of Citizenship and Immigration Canada in processing his application for permanent residence in Canada. 

 

[2]               Justice Snider determined that the test for summary judgment was whether there was a genuine issue for trial.  Having reviewed the evidence, the extensive caselaw that she was directed to and the detailed arguments of counsel, she determined that even though there were many difficulties with the respondent’s case, it had not been established that his case was so doubtful that it did not deserve to be heard by the trial court.  Accordingly, she concluded that there was a genuine issue for trial and dismissed the Crown’s motion.

 

[3]               We are unable to discern any error of law or any palpable and overriding factual error on the part of Justice Snider in reaching her decision and accordingly, without commenting upon the merits of the claim, we will dismiss the appeal with costs.  

 

 

“C. Michael Ryer”

J.A

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

DOCKET:                                                      A-485-06

 

An appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal, from the Order of Madam Justice Snider, dated October 30, 2006, from file IMM-6468-03, whereby the Appellants’ motion for summary judgment of the action, was dismissed, in part.

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                      THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND

                                                                        IMMIGRATION ET AL

Appellants

 

                                                                        and

 

                                                                        HASSAN SAMIMIFAR

Respondent

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                TORONTO, ONTARIO

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                  JUNE 25, 2007

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE

COURT BY:                                                   (SEXTON, SHARLOW & RYER JJ.A.)

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:    RYER J.A.

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Marina Stefanovic

Margherita Braccio

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

Lorne Waldman

Tanya Tokar

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

Waldman & Associates

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 


Date: 20070625

Docket: A-485-06

 

Toronto, Ontario, June 25, 2007

 

CORAM:       SEXTON J.A.

                        SHARLOW J.A.

                        RYER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION AND

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellant

and

HASSAN SAMIMIFAR

Respondent

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

      The appeal is dismissed with cost.

 

 

“J. Edgar Sexton ”

J.A.

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.