Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20070816

Docket: A-307-07

Citation: 2007 FCA 267

 

CORAM:       NOËL J.A.

                        NADON J.A.

                        EVANS J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

MUSTAPHA MAGTOUF

Appellant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

 

 

 

Motion dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.

 

Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 16, 2007.

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER:                                                                                                   NADON J.A.

 

CONCURRED IN BY:                                                                                                     NOËL J.A.

                                                                                                                                        EVANS J.A.

 


Date: 20070816

Docket: A-307-07

Citation: 2007 FCA 267

 

CORAM:       NOËL J.A.

                        NADON J.A.

                        EVANS J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

MUSTAPHA MAGTOUF

Appellant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER

NADON J.A.

[1]               Despite the fact that Justice Blais refused to certify that the matter involved a serious question of general importance, as required by paragraph 74(d) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, as subsequently amended, the appellant maintains that he is entitled to appeal the judgment rendered on May 3, 2007. More particularly, the appellant argues that the judge failed to exercise his jurisdiction in refusing to certify the question submitted to him for certification.

 

[2]               In my view, the appellant’s claim has no merit. It is clear from Justice Blais’s reasons that he considered the question submitted by the appellant for certification and concluded that it was not a question of general importance that ought to be certified.

 

[3]               Accordingly, it is not open to the appellant to claim, as he does, that the judge refused to exercise his jurisdiction.

 

[4]               For these reasons, the respondent’s motion will be allowed and the appellant’s notice of appeal will be struck, with costs.

 

 

“M. Nadon”

J.A.

 

“I agree.

       Marc Noël J.A.”

 

“I agree.

       John M. Evans J.A.”

 

 

 

 

Certified true translation

Erich Klein


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                             A-307-07

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                            MUSTAPHA MAGTOUF v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                            NADON J.A.

 

CONCURRED IN BY:                                                        NOËL J.A.

                                                                                                EVANS J.A.

 

DATED:                                                                                August 16, 2007

 

 

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

 

Jean Gobeil

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

 

Normand Lemyre

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

The Community Legal Centre of Montreal

Montréal, QC

 

 

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.