Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Naguib v. Canada

Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date 2007-12-13
Neutral citation 2007 FCA 403
File numbers A-138-03

Decision Content

 

Date: 20071213

Docket: A-138-03

Citation: 2007 FCA 403

BETWEEN:

FAIDY FOUAD NAGUIB

Appellant

and

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

 

 

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

Charles E. Stinson

Assessment Officer

[1]               The Court dismissed with costs this appeal of a decision of the Tax Court of Canada concerning net worth reassessment. I issued a timetable for written disposition of the assessment of the Respondent's amended bill of costs.

 

[2]               The Appellant did not file any materials in response to the Respondent's materials. My view, often expressed in comparable circumstances, is that the Federal Courts Rules do not contemplate a litigant benefiting by having an assessment officer step away from a neutral position to act as the litigant's advocate in challenging given items in a bill of costs. However, the assessment officer cannot certify unlawful items, i.e. those outside the authority of the judgment and the tariff. I examined each item claimed in the amended bill of costs and the supporting materials within those parameters.

 

[3]               Certain items warrant my intervention as I feel that the Respondent cannot establish entitlement thereto notwithstanding the absence of objections from the Appellant. The amended bill of costs claimed a counsel fee item 21(a) for two motions addressing the contents of the appeal book. As the resultant orders were silent on costs, I am satisfied further to my conclusions in Balisky v. Canada (Minister of Natural Resources), [2004] F.C.J. No. 536 at para. 6 (A.O.) and Aird v. Country Park Village Properties (Mainland) Ltd., [2005] F.C.J. No. 1426 at para. 10 (A.O.), that I have no jurisdiction to allow item 21(a). As well, I have reduced the claimed disbursement total by $205.00 to account for these motions. The Respondent's amended bill of costs, presented at $3,524.49, is assessed and allowed at $2,599.49.

 

 

"Charles E. Stinson"

Assessment Officer

 

 

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                          A-138-03

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          FAIDY FOUAD NAGUIB v. HMQ

 

 

 

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES

 

 

 

REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF COSTS:                    CHARLES E. STINSON

 

DATED:                                                                                 December 13, 2007

 

 

 

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS:

 

n/a

 

FOR THE APPELLANT

Ms. Kandia Aird

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Marciano Beckenstein LLP

Concord, ON

 

FOR THE APPELLANT

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.