Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20021106

Docket: A-598-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 433

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

NADON J.A.

EVANS J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                            RICHARD McKERROW

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                              MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                           Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 6, 2002.

                   Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 6, 2002.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                         EVANS J.A.


Date: 20021106

Docket: A-598-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 433

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

NADON J.A.

EVANS J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                            RICHARD McKERROW

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                              MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                                           (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario

                                                               on November 6, 2002.)

EVANS J.A.

[1]                 This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Pensions Appeals Board, dated August 31, 2001, in which the Board dismissed an appeal by Richard McKerrow against the denial of his claim for disability benefits under the Canada Pension Plan, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-8.


[2]                 We are not persuaded that the Board made any error of law in identifying or applying the correct legal test defining a claimant's eligibility for disability benefits. Rather, counsel's submissions related essentially to the Board's findings of fact, and the adequacy of its reasons.

[3]                 In our view, the Board's findings cannot be characterized as patently unreasonable or made without regard to the material before it.

[4]                 We are also of the view that the Board's reasons fairly summarized the principal evidence submitted to it. It was not required to refer to each and every piece of documentary evidence. The Board's conclusion that, when considered in the context of the evidence as a whole, Mr. McKerrow's oral evidence was insufficient to discharge the burden of proof was not a finding of non-credibility, the basis of which the Board was obliged to explain specifically.

[5]                 For these reasons, the application for judicial review will be dismissed, without costs.

   

                                                                                                                                             "John M. Evans"             

line

                                                                                                                                                                  J.A.                         


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

   

DOCKET:                                                           A-598-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          RICHARD McKERROW v. MINISTER

OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

  

PLACE OF HEARING:                                   OTTAWA, ONTARIO

  

DATE OF HEARING:                                     NOVEMBER 6, 2002

  

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(DÉCARY, NADON AND EVANS JJ.A)

RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY EVANS J.A.

   

APPEARANCES:

MR. GLEN R. AGAR                           FOR THE APPLICANT

MS. MARY TOBIN OATES                           FOR THE RESPONDENT

   

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

CLINIQUE JURIDIQUE GRAND-NORD      FOR THE APPLICANT

LEGAL CLINIC

Kapuskasing, Ontario

MORRIS ROSENBERG                                    FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.