Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20081104

Docket: A-13-08

Citation: 2008 FCA 344

 

CORAM:       NOËL J.A.

                        NADON J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

CHC GLOBAL OPERATIONS,

A DIVISION OF CHC HELICOPTERS INTERNATIONAL INC.

Applicant

and

GLOBAL HELICOPTER PILOTS ASSOCIATION

Respondent

 

 

 

Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on November 4, 2008.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on November 4, 2008.

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                            PELLETIER J.A.

 


Date: 20081104

Docket: A-13-08

Citation: 2008 FCA 344

 

CORAM:       NOËL J.A.

                        NADON J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

CHC GLOBAL OPERATIONS,

A DIVISION OF CHC HELICOPTERS INTERNATIONAL INC.

Applicant

and

GLOBAL HELICOPTER PILOTS ASSOCIATION

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia, on November 4, 2008)

PELLETIER J.A.

[1]               These reasons will be filed as reasons for judgment in docket nos. A-13-08 and A-151-08.

 

[2]               The jurisprudence of this Court is clear that appeals from interlocutory decisions should not be entertained save in exceptional circumstances. As we decided in Prince Rupert Grain Ltd. v. Grain Workers’ Union, Local 333, 2005 FCA 401, [2005] F.C.J. No. 2055 at paragraph 5, the mere fact that the impugned decision raises or purports to raise a jurisdictional issue is not, in itself, an exceptional circumstance.

 

[3]               Even if one accepts Mr. Fairweather’s proposition that the Canada Industrial Relations Board has made a final decision, it does not follow that we should intervene. The policy reasons which underlie the practice of declining to hear appeals from interlocutory decisions do not turn on whether the decision is right or wrong. Justice is better served if the tribunal below is allowed to complete its work (see paragraph 2 of Prince Rupert Grain Ltd., supra) so that appeals to this Court can proceed on the basis that all contested issues can be reviewed in one hearing on the basis of a comprehensive record.

 

[4]               For these reasons, we are of the view that we should not intervene at this time and that both appeals should be dismissed with costs.

 

 

"J.D. Denis Pelletier"

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A-13-08

 

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                               CHC GLOBAL OPERATIONS V.

                                                                                                GLOBAL HELICOPTER PILOTS ASSOCIATION

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                        Vancouver, British Columbia

 

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                                          November 4, 2008

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:       NOËL J.A.

                                                                                                NADON J.A.

                                                                                                PELLETIER J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:                            PELLETIER J.A.

 

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Paul Fairweather

Scott McCann

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

Douglas J. Wray

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Harris & Company LLP

Vancouver, B.C.

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

Caley Wray

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.