Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20190404


Docket: A‑191‑18

Citation: 2019 FCA 71

[ENGLISH TRANSLATION]

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

GPP

Appellant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on April 4, 2019.

Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on April 4, 2019.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

 


Date: 20190404


Docket: A‑191‑18

Citation: 2019 FCA 71

CORAM:

NADON J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

 

 

BETWEEN:

GPP

Appellant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on April 4, 2019.)

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

[1] The appellant has not satisfied us that the Federal Court erred in its interpretation of section 31 of An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, S.C. 2014, c. 22, nor has the appellant demonstrated that the criteria for obtaining a mandamus were met. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed without costs and the certified question must be answered as follows:

Does section 13.1 of the Citizenship Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C‑29, allow the Minister to suspend an application for citizenship made before August 1, 2014 and not finally disposed of before that date?

Answer: yes.

“Yves de Montigny”

J.A.

Certified true translation

Erich Klein


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

A‑191‑18

 

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

GPP v. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Montréal, Quebec

 

DATE OF HEARING:

April 4, 2019

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

NADON J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

DE MONTIGNY J.A.

 

APPEARANCES:

Claudia Andrea Molina

 

For the appellant

 

Lisa Maziade

 

For the respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Cabinet Molina Inc.

Montréal, Quebec

 

For the appellant

 

Nathalie G. Drouin

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Montréal, Quebec

 

For the respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.