Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Irvine v. Canada (Attorney General)

Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date 2011-06-20
Neutral citation 2011 FCA 210
File numbers A-269-10

Decision Content

Federal Court of Appeal

Cour d'appel fédérale

Date: 20110620

Docket: A-269-10

Citation: 2011 FCA 210

 

CORAM:       PELLETIER J.A.

                        DAWSON J.A.

                        MAINVILLE J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

DON IRVINE

Applicant

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

 

 

 

Heard at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, on June 20, 2011.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, on June 20, 2011.

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                             PELLETIER J.A.

 

Federal Court of Appeal

Cour d'appel fédérale

Date: 20110620

Docket: A-269-10

Citation: 2011 FCA 210

 

CORAM:       PELLETIER J.A.

                        DAWSON J.A.

                        MAINVILLE J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

DON IRVINE

Applicant

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, on June 20, 2011)

PELLETIER J.A.

[1]               We are all of the view that Mr. Irvine’s application for judicial review of Umpire Marin’s decision dismissing his application for reconsideration under section 120 of the Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996, c. 23, must be dismissed.

 

[2]               The ground advanced for the application for reconsideration was that the Umpire erred in failing to give effect to a material fact when he ignored the handwritten alterations to the Proposal in Bankruptcy which was incorporated into an order of the Court of Queen’s Bench in Bankruptcy and Insolvency on the basis that the alterations were not authenticated.

 

[3]               In our view, none of the handwritten alterations was, in any way, material to Mr. Irvine’s claim. The Umpire recognized this and, as a result, he dismissed the application for reconsideration. We find no error in his having done so.

 

[4]               As a result, the application for judicial review will be dismissed, but without costs.

 

 

 

 

"J.D. Denis Pelletier"

J.A.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A-269-10

 

APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW FROM A DECISION OF THE HONOURABLE R.J. MARIN, UMPIRE, DATED NOVEMBER 25, 2009

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                              DON IRVINE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                        Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

 

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                                          June 20, 2011

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:       PELLETIER, DAWSON, MAINVILLE, JJ.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:                            PELLETIER J.A.

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Ronald Cherkewich

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

Benoit Laframboise

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Legal Services

Prince Albert, Saskatchewan

 

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

Myles J. Kirvan

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.