Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 20121002

Docket: A-55-12

Citation: 2012 FCA 249

 

CORAM:       BLAIS C.J.

                        NADON J.A.

                        STRATAS J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

CHIEF PENSIONS ADVOCATE

Appellant

and

VETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD

Respondent

 

 

 

Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 2, 2012.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 2, 2012.

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                            NADON J.A.

 



Date: 20121002

Docket: A-55-12

Citation: 2012 FCA 249

 

CORAM:       BLAIS C.J.

                        NADON J.A.

                        STRATAS J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

CHIEF PENSIONS ADVOCATE

Appellant

and

VETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 2, 2012)

NADON J.A.

[1]               In view of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2012 SCC 10, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 364, our decision in The President of the Canada Border Services Agency and the Attorney General of Canada v. C.B. Powell Ltd., 2010 FCA 61, February 23, 2010, and that of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Oleg Volochay v. College of Massage Therapists of Ontario, 2012 ONCA 541, August 20, 2012, we see no basis to interfere with the decision of Mactavish J. dismissing the appellant’s judicial review application on the ground that it was premature.

 

[2]               In the end, the process should follow its regular course, and upon completion thereof, the appellant will no doubt have the opportunity, if not satisfied with the result, of challenging by way of a judicial review application the Veterans Review and Appeal Board’s decision, and of raising the issue which it says should be decided now.

 

[3]               For these reasons, the appeal will be dismissed with costs.

 

 

“M. Nadon”

J.A.

 

 

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                             A-55-12

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                            CHIEF PENSIONS ADVOCATE v. VETERANS REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                      Ottawa, Ontario

 

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                                        October 2, 2012

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:   BLAIS C.J., NADON and STRATAS JJ.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:                         NADON J.A.

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Charles C. Duguay

Robert A. McConnell

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

 

Laura Kell

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Bureau of Pensions Advocates,

Charlottetown, P.E.I.

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

 

Veterans Review and Appeal Board,

Charlottown, P.E.I.

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.