Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20140130


Dockets: A-27-13

A-28-13

Citation: 2014 FCA 23

CORAM :       PELLETIER J.A.TRUDEL J.A.

MAINVILLE J.a.

 

BETWEEN:

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

and

 

JOSÉE ROY

Respondent

Heard at Québec, Quebec, on January 30, 2014.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Québec, Quebec, on January 30, 2014.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                      MAINVILLE J.A.

 


Date: 20140130


Dockets: A-27-13

A-28-13

Citation: 2014 FCA 23

CORAM :      PELLETIER J.A.

TRUDEL J.A.

MAINVILLE J.a.

 

BETWEEN:

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

and

 

JOSÉE ROY

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Québec, Quebec, on January 30, 2014.)

MAINVILLE J.A.

[1]          Given all the facts considered by the Board of Referees, and in the light of the applicable standard of review, the applicant has not satisfied us that the Umpire made a reviewable error in refusing to intervene in respect of the decisions of the Board of Referees.

[2]          The applications for judicial review will therefore be dismissed.

“Robert M. Mainville”

J.A.

Certified true translation

François Brunet, Revisor


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 


DOCKETS:

A-27-13

A-28-13

STYLE OF CAUSE:

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA v. JOSÉE ROY

PLACE OF HEARING:

Québec, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:

January 30, 2014

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

PELLETIER J.A.

TRUDEL J.A.

MAINVILLE J.A.

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

MAINVILLE J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Chantal Labonté

FOR THE APPLICANT       

Josée Roy

FOR THE RESPONDENT   

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

William F. Pentney

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE APPLICANT


 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.