57,930 result(s)
-
26.
Szebenyi v. Canada - 2003 FCA 81 - 2003-02-14
Federal Court of Appeal Decisionsj) Order of Martineau, J. dated September 27, 2002; k) Order of Beaudry J., dated October 2, 2002; [...] m) letter dated August 8, 2002; n) letter dated August 19, 2002 and bill of costs for $1,013.85; [...] l) letter dated August 8, 2002; m) letter dated August 19, 2002 and bill of costs for $1,013.85;
-
27.
Mian v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2001 FCT 433 - 2001-05-03
Federal Court DecisionsInstead of giving her correct date of birth which she says is November 29, 1932 (the AEarlier Date@), he provided an incorrect date (the AError@) which is January 4, 1940 (the ALater Date@). [...] The form was pre-printed and it again showed the Later Date as the Applicant's date of birth. [...] While it suggests that the Applicant could be older than the Later Date might indicate, it also shows that he noted the Later Date as the Applicant's birth date on her medical chart.
-
28.
Platypus Marine, Inc. v. Tatu (Ship) - 2017 FCA 184 - 2017-09-12
Federal Court of Appeal DecisionsFrom Date To Date Days Interest $285,508.92 .954044% Sept 19, 2014 [...] The oral agreement was made after the date of the last invoice. The parties have not supplied an agreed-upon date, but the Judge held that the effective date was September 19, 2014 as this was the earliest possible date that the oral agreement could have been made. [...] As set out in the following chart, if interest ran from two days after the invoice date (one day after the date of the breach, and the guaranteed date of delivery of the invoice), then 60% per annum would result in a payment of US $100,529.78.
-
29.
Abraham v. The Queen - 2004 TCC 380 - 2004-05-19
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsDate: 20040519 Docket: 2002-4856(IT)APP BETWEEN: RICHARD ABRAHAM, [...] (i) the day that is one year after the taxpayer's filing-due date for the year, and [...] DATE OF JUDGMENT: May 19, 2004 APPEARANCES: Counsel for the Applicant:
-
30.
Alhaqli v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 728 - 2017-07-27
Federal Court DecisionsNew date Nouvelle date (11) If an application for a change to the date or time of a proceeding is allowed, the new date fixed by the Division must be no later than 10 working days after the date originally fixed for the proceeding or as soon as possible after that date. [...] Hearing date cancelled: November 30, 2016 [BLANK] New hearing date: [...] Original hearing date: December 6, 2016 [BLANK] Hearing date cancelled:
-
31.
Zulquerain v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2000-11-23
Federal Court DecisionsThe fax further stated the IRB was not advised of these dates because counsel assumed the hearing would be moved at least two weeks further from the original date. [...] The applicant's January 14, 2000 request failed to provide proposed alternative dates and arrive within two weeks of the hearing date. [...] [23] The second request for an adjournment was made on January 24, 2000 to adjourn the new hearing date of January 27, 2000 to other dates in February, 2000.
-
32.
Stellarbridge Management Inc. v. The Queen - 2019 TCC 134 - 2019-06-13
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsBy Notice of Confirmation dated March 11, 2016, the Minister confirmed the reassessment on the basis that the fair market value of the Land as at the Valuation Date was $8 million. [...] • Functional Servicing Report prepared by UEL, dated October 16, 2009; [...] [123] However, the evidence has shown that between the Valuation Date and the inspection date, significant changes had been made to the Land.
-
33.
Afs and Co. Ltd. v. Canada - 2001 FCT 422 - 2001-05-01
Federal Court Decisions1. the affidavit of Bonnie Roberts dated July 26, 2000; 2. the affidavit of Mark Jadd dated September 11, 2000; [...] a) document 9, handwritten notes only, various dates; b) document 10, handwritten notes only, various dates; [...] e) document 14, handwritten notes only, various dates; f) document 16, handwritten notes only, various dates;
-
34.
World Corp. v. The Queen - 2003 TCC 494 - 2003-07-17
Tax Court of Canada Judgments(c) while a draft Commission Agreement existed as of the valuation date, it was never executed as of that date by SCP; [...] In order to secure any part of the commission not paid to the agent on the Closing Date, the Partnership has agreed to assign and negotiate the Note III of each investor, together with the corresponding post-dated cheques to the agent on the closing date... [...] [49] Counsel said that the OM states that the Notes III and corresponding post-dated cheques were meant to pay the commission and that the partnership had agreed to assign and negotiate the Notes III and post-dated cheques to the agent on the closing date.
-
35.
Adewa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2002 FCT 1024 - 2002-10-01
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 20021001 Docket: IMM-4556-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 1024 [...] This was not the case as the August 17, 2001 date was only for the purpose of setting a date for hearing the appeal. [...] Date: 20021001 Docket: IMM-4556-01 BETWEEN: BECKLEY SUNDAY ADEWA
-
36.
Innocent v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship) - 2020 FC 390 - 2020-03-19
Federal Court Decisions[32] The refugee protection claim date must be discarded right away. [...] [35] The date of March 21, 2017, when the sponsorship application wad filed, was the date used by the immigration officer who decided the application. [...] DATE OF HEARING: DECEMBER 11, 2019 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT anD JUDGMENT:
-
37.
Guylas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2015 FC 202 - 2015-02-18
Federal Court Decisions(11) If an application for a change to the date or time of a proceeding is allowed, the new date fixed by the Division must be no later than 10 working days after the date originally fixed for the proceeding or as soon as possible after that date. [...] (11) Si la demande de changement de date ou d’heure d’une procédure est accueillie, la Section fixe une nouvelle date qui tombe au plus tard dix jours ouvrables après la date initialement fixée ou dès que possible après cette date. [...] DATE OF HEARING: December 3, 2014 JUDGMENT AND REASONS: ANNIS J.
-
38.
Lack v. The Queen - 2003 TCC 230 - 2003-04-14
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsI accept that the disposition sheet bearing the date "April 21, 1997" was signed by the judge on that date. [...] that an order cannot have an earlier "made" date, even if not effective until after the made date, and secondly, the subject order cannot likely be said to have a later effective date just because the only aspect of it that is date sensitive, namely the first payment date for child support payments, is a future date. [...] In any event, the "made" date governs in this case which is not the same date as when an order takes effect.
-
39.
Saugeen First Nation #29 v. Sebastian - 2003 FCA 111 - 2003-03-05
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions[...] (b) if the plaintiff fails to obtain judgment, the defendant shall be entitled to party-and-party costs to the date of the service of the offer and to double such costs, excluding disbursements, from that date to the date of judgment. [...] (b) if the plaintiff fails to obtain judgment, the defendant shall be entitled to party-and-party costs to the date of the service of the offer and to double such costs, excluding disbursements, from that date to the date of judgment. [...] b) n'obtient pas gain de cause lors du jugement, le défendeur a droit aux dépens partie-partie jusqu'à la date de signification de l'offre et au double de ces dépens, à l'exclusion des débours, à compter du lendemain de cette date jusqu'à la date du jugement.
-
40.
Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. Boston Scientific Ltd. - 2004 FC 1672 - 2004-11-30
Federal Court DecisionsThey further contend that the date for determining small entity status is the "filing date" for the patent application. [...] [76] The defendant submits that the date for determining small entity status should be the Canadian filing date. [...] 28. (1) The filing date of an application for a patent a in Canada is the date on which the Commissioner receives the documents, information and fees prescribed for the purposes of this section or, if they are received on different dates, the last date.
-
41.
Aryeh-Bain v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2019 FC 964 - 2019-07-26
Federal Court Decisions• the Canada Elections Act provides for a general election to be held on a fixed date; the next fixed election date is October 21, 2019. [...] [27] The CEO has maintained that “Elections Canada does not choose the date of the election” and “the CEO cannot now recommend a change in the date of the election”. [...] Elections Canada does not choose the election dates. The Canada Elections Act provides for a general election to be held on a fixed date.
-
42.
Canada Post Corp. v. Epost Innovations Inc. - 1999-08-13
Federal Court DecisionsThe filing date, as opposed to the claimed date of first use, is obviously a date when the Plaintiff filed application for registration of its mark. [...] [31] In the present case, Canada Post provided only one date for each mark, which could be either of the filing date or the date of first use. [...] Epost asks Canada Post to clarify whether the dates in the Schedules to the Statement of Claim are the dates of first use or the filing dates.
-
43.
Orduno Ferrer v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2021 FC 1010 - 2021-09-29
Federal Court Decisions● New lock-in date: The lock-in date for the age of a child of an in-Canada refugee claimant who has acquired protected person status is the date on which IRCC or the CBSA received the principal applicant’s refugee claim [R25.1(9)]. [...] As mentioned, CIC’s practice was to set the lock-in date as the date it received a completed application for permanent residence. [...] A later lock-in date could result in aging children surpassing the cut off date to qualify as dependents.
-
44.
Millard v. Canada (Attorney General) - 1998-06-15
Federal Court DecisionsRevision 4397 dated 91-03-15 (TofC, A. - Q.9.) K.5. Revision 4925 dated 93-08-06 (K.4.b.2.2 - K.6.d.1) [...] Revision 4490 dated 91-10-10 (App. VI-2-1/pgs. 3, 4) Revision 4397 dated 91-03-15 (App. VI-2-1/pgs. 5-14) [...] Revision 4730 dated 92-09-16 (App. VI-2-1/pgs. 15, 16) Revision 4397 dated 91-03-15 (App. VI-2-1/pgs. 17-22)
-
45.
Canada (Attorney General) v. Ader - 2017 FC 838 - 2017-09-25
Federal Court DecisionsUnsigned disclosure Letter for RCMP investigation dated 2 July 2009. [...] Notebook of Mike LESAGE, dated October 15, 2008 - November 26, 2008. [...] Notes of RCMP Gilles MICHAUD dated 2008-10-31 to 2008-12-28. p. 48
-
46.
A. Lassonde Inc. v. Sun Pac Foods Ltd. - 2004 FC 1240 - 2004-09-14
Federal Court DecisionsBy Order dated February 22, 2000, Lassonde's motion was granted in part. [...] The Order dated June 5, 2000, dismissed Lassonde's appeal. Order dated June 5, 2000 (Harris Affidavit, Ex. "N") [...] The stay was granted by Order dated February 4, 2002. Order dated February 4, 2002 (Harris Affidavit, Ex. "S")
-
47.
Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v. Coors Brewing Company - 2024 FC 169 - 2024-02-28
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 20240228 Docket: T-1050-21 Citation: 2024 FC 169 Ottawa, Ontario, February 28, 2024 [...] [55] Turning to the start date for the period of non-use, the Registrar’s decision sets out the parties’ positions, and then notes that “where a trademark was recently acquired by a new owner, a number of cases have considered the acquisition date as the relevant date when assessing non-use... [...] DATE OF HEARING: february 8 and 9, 2022 JUDGMENT AND REASONS: pentney j.
-
48.
Zavarella v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2010 FC 815 - 2010-08-11
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 20100811 Docket: T-1784-09 Citation: 2010 FC 815 Ottawa, Ontario, August 11, 2010 [...] b) que la période d’incapacité du demandeur a cessé avant cette date; [...] [27] The same is true of the report by Dr. Cole, dated November 26, 2003.
-
49.
Apotex inc. v. Janssen inc. et al. - 2023 FC 216 - 2023-02-14
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 20230214 Dockets: T-607-21 T-1168-21 T-732-22 Citation: 2023 FC 216 [...] [107] As with category 1, PMS also submits that the request is overbroad because it covers the period from the earliest patent hold date to the real world launch date. [...] I understand the logic of the Non-Parties’ submission that information pre-dating the patent hold date and post-dating the real-world launch date is unlikely to be instructive.
-
50.
Mercredi v. Mikisew Cree First Nation - 2015 FC 1374 - 2015-12-09
Federal Court DecisionsBy its clear and unambiguous language this section contemplates a date for delivery of a written notice of resignation to Council and an effective date of the resignation, and that these dates may differ. [...] This is further supported by the wording of section 16.1 (a)(i) of the CER, which states that a date for a by-election cannot be set by Council until five days after the "effective date" of resignation, not five days after "the date Notice is delivered to Council". [...] [16] Indeed, Councillor Courtoreille understood the Regulations provided that his resignation would actually take place on the date he selected as its “effective” date.