57,488 result(s)
-
76.
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2023 FC 1078 - 2023-08-04
Federal Court DecisionsChanging the Date or Time of a Proceeding Changement de date ou d’heure d’une procédure [...] (5) If, at the time the officer fixed the hearing date under subrule 3(1), a claimant did not have counsel or was unable to provide the dates when their counsel would be available to attend a hearing, the claimant may make an application to change the date or time of the hearing. [...] DATE OF HEARING: jULY 24, 2023 JUDGMENT AND REASONS: PAMEL J. DATED:
-
77.
American Assn. of Retired Persons v. Canadian Assn. of Retired Persons - 1998-12-10
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 19981210 Docket: T-638-97 IN THE MATTER OF an Opposition by the American [...] The material date as of which the respondent must prove distinctiveness is the date of the filing of the Statement of Opposition (January 31, 1992). [...] There is some uncertainty in the jurisprudence concerning the appropriate date for the latter but I think the date that is generally accepted is the date of the filing of the opposition.
-
78.
Ferlaino v. The Queen - 2016 TCC 105 - 2016-04-28
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsDate: 20160428 Docket: 2015-1025(IT)I BETWEEN: NATALE FERLAINO, [...] If the cost base of the shares was fixed for tax purposes effective the date of the grant of the stock options, there would in fact be an accrual of the benefit from that date. [...] He concludes that it was on the date of the grant of the stock options.
-
79.
Saquet v. ADM Agri-Industries Ltd. - 2007 FC 667 - 2007-06-21
Federal Court Decisions1. Report of Mr. Bob Douglas dated February 3, 2004; 2. Correspondence from the Commission to the Appellants’ counsel dated April 21, 2004; [...] 9. Correspondence dated May 6, 2005 from the Appellants to the Commission; [...] DATED: June 21, 2007 APPEARANCES: Mr. A. Bruun FOR THE APPLICANTS
-
80.
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Chung - 2018 FC 238 - 2018-03-02
Federal Court Decisions(h) whether the time and date fixed for the proceeding were peremptory; [...] h) si la date et l’heure qui avaient été fixées étaient péremptoires; [...] DATE OF HEARING: February 14, 2018 JUDGMENT AND REASONS: PHELAN J.
-
81.
Rahmani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2012 FC 358 - 2012-03-26
Federal Court DecisionsThe Applicant responded by letter dated July 9, 2009 in which he wrote the following (AR at 41): “Please note that the birth date submitted by me as October 10th, 1986 is the correct birthdate. [...] DATE OF HEARING: March 22, 2012 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT: NOËL J. [...] DATED: March 26, 2012 APPEARANCES: Andréa de Rocquiny FOR THE APPLICANT
-
82.
Hamid v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2005 FC 1632 - 2005-12-01
Federal Court Decisions[15] The term "lock-in" is used to describe the situation where an application is to be assessed as of the date of application rather than the date of processing. [...] A person cannot be continuously engaged in an activity as of a date certain; one must examine the time surrounding the date to determine if an activity is continuous. [...] "The application date is the only date within the control of the Applicant and is consequently the only date that can be established without arbitrariness" (Choi, above, at para. 8).
-
83.
Robert v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2020 FC 598 - 2020-05-07
Federal Court Decisions[7] As stated above, Captain Robert disputes her EPZ date. She now claims that her promotion should have been on a date other than May 18, 2013; the grievance referred to the date of June 30, 2011, the date on which her mandatory military training for the PSel position was completed. [...] This is the reference date in this case since it is the date on which the grievance is based. [...] [21] Thus, the initial date of May 18, 2010, the date Captain Robert was promoted to the rank of lieutenant, becomes March 8, 2009.
-
84.
Geddes Contracting co. Ltd. v. The Queen - 2004 TCC 541 - 2004-08-04
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsDate: 20040804 Docket: 95-978(IT)G BETWEEN: GEDDES CONTRACTING CO. LTD., [...] Exhibit A-30 Copy of cheque from Penn West to Grand Bell dated May 20, 2004. [...] DATES OF HEARING: May 14, 2004 and July 6, 2004 REASONS FOR ORDER BY:
-
85.
NCS Insternational Inc. v. Canada - 1996-10-16
Federal Court Decisions28. By Notice of Objection dated December 3, 1991, the Plaintiff objected to the Notice of Determination Number PAC 07001 dated March 29, 1991. [...] 32. By Notice of Decision dated July 31, 1992, the Minister of National Revenue disallowed the Plaintiff's objection dated December 11, 1991, and confirmed Assessment Number PAC 5149. [...] DATED: October 16, 1996 APPEARANCES: Mr. F. Andrew Schroeder FOR THE PLAINTIFFS
-
86.
928412 Ontario Limited v. Canada - 1997-05-06
Federal Court DecisionsAccordingly the plaintiff submits, it is only upon this date, the date of actual notification, November 4, 1996, that the ninety day limitation period set out in s-s.135(1) commences. [...] Accordingly the plaintiff submits, it is on this date, the date of actual receipt, and not the date of mailing, that the limitation period specified in s.135(1) commences. [...] REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MacKAY DATED: 6 May 1997
-
87.
Teva Canada Limited v. Pfizer Canada Inc. - 2014 FC 248 - 2014-04-03
Federal Court Decisions[52] Paragraph 8(1)(a) clearly establishes a default commencement date - the Patent Hold Date. [...] [60] I note that there appears to be no impediment in section 8 to a court finding that a date earlier than the certified date is a more appropriate date to commence the Relevant Period. [...] Mr. Palmer considered such cut off dates where applicable and where February 13, 2006 post-dated a cut off date, he assumed that Ratiopharm would have to wait until the following update to be listed.
-
88.
Wells v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2018 FC 483 - 2018-07-03
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 20180703 Dockets: T-638-17 T-644-17 Citation: 2018 FC 483 [...] In this case, the date of the application post-dates the Recognition Order and there [sic] cannot be presumed to reflect the fact that the Applicant had self-identified on the date of the Recognition Order. [...] In short, what is the justification in requiring that the evidence date from June 23, 2008, and not some other date that precedes September 22, 2011?
-
89.
Blais v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2011 FCA 320 - 2011-11-21
Federal Court of Appeal DecisionsOn appeal, the first Board of Referees accepted the Commission’s position regarding the date of allocation (decision dated September 8, 2004). [...] Date Breakdown of calculations following decision by the Board of Referees (BR) dated December 13, 2007 [...] Effect of the decision dated December 13, 2007 [37] The December 13, 2007, decision amended the date as of which the allocation was determined by setting the date proposed by the applicants, December 31, 1999, as the date of termination of employment.
-
90.
Shy Brothers Ltd. v. The Queen - 2011 TCC 419 - 2011-09-08
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsThe time to serve these notices of objection is extended to the date of this Order and these notices of objection shall be deemed to have been served on the date of this Order. [...] Date: 20110908 Docket: 2011-1955(IT)APP BETWEEN: SHY BROTHERS LTD. [...] The time to serve these notices of objection is extended to the date of this Order and these notices of objection shall be deemed to have been served on the date of this Order;
-
91.
Norman v. The Queen - 2006 TCC 472 - 2006-09-25
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsDate: 20060925 Docket: 2004-3953(GST)G BETWEEN: ROBERT LARRY NORMAN, [...] A true copy of the said letter dated March 30, 2005 is attached as Exhibit "A" to my Affidavit. [...] DATE OF ORDER: September 25, 2006 APPEARANCES: For the Appellant:
-
92.
Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc. - 2017 FC 806 - 2017-09-08
Federal Court DecisionsII.7.1.1 Naming the Date of First Use II.7.1.1 Déclaration concernant la date de premier emploi de la marque [...] However, in all cases the date of first use cannot be subsequent to the filing date of the application. [...] Cependant, dans tous les cas, la date de premier emploi ne peut être postérieure à la date de production de la demande.
-
93.
Shekhtman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 964 - 2018-09-28
Federal Court DecisionsSecond, the Refusal Decision was dated July 14, 2016, not November 30, 2016. [...] DATE OF HEARING: September 5, 2018 JUDGMENT AND REASONS: GASCON J. [...] DATED: September 28, 2018 APPEARANCES: Adam Hummel For The Applicant
-
94.
Amiante Spec Inc. v. The Queen - 2008 TCC 89 - 2008-04-29
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsDate Project Cost (before taxes) (a) June 6, 2000 (work order dated May 18, 2000) [...] [66] The second invoice related to the Armstrong company site is dated January 18, 2002 and contains the reference [TRANSLATION] "Work done to date (50%)." [...] [67] The third and last invoice concerning the Armstrong company site is dated February 15, 2002, and refers to work done to date (100%).
-
95.
Wax v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2006 FC 675 - 2006-06-01
Federal Court DecisionsFor calculation purposes, the CCRA initially considered November 4, 1993 as the effective date of the loss carry back (effective date) (Applicant’s Record, Tab 1, p. 5). [...] More specifically, Mr. Wax requested that the effective date of the loss carry back correspond to the statutory date of production of his declaration for the year of the loss (April 30, 1992), not the statutory expiration date to file a request for the loss carry back (November 4, 1993). [...] After a third request made on January 9, 2002 to change the effective date, the CCRA agreed to deem the statutory date of production of the declaration for 1992 (April 30, 1992) as the effective date, and granted the Applicant some relief.
-
96.
Canada v. Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited - 2016 FCA 130 - 2016-04-26
Federal Court of Appeal DecisionsDate: 20160426 Docket: A-532-14 Citation: 2016 FCA 130 CORAM: TRUDEL J.A. [...] Conversions occurred on the date (the “Conversion Date”) upon which all of the formalities stipulated in the Convertible Debenture Security Form were completed. [...] The Taxpayer thus asserts that this subscription amount “arose” on the Issuance Date and had to be translated into Canadian currency on that date.
-
97.
Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc - 2015 FC 875 - 2015-07-20
Federal Court DecisionsFor the reasons already given, this priority date of the ‘784 Patent cannot be the relevant date. [...] He rather used the priority date as the date for assessment of obviousness double patenting. [...] When these two dates are eliminated, only two others remain in contention, namely, the priority date of the 377 Patent or the priority date of the 784 Patent.
-
98.
Denso Manufacturing Canada, Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue) - 2020 FC 360 - 2020-03-10
Federal Court DecisionsThe Denso Companies had done so with an effective date of April 1, 2007. [...] 2) The effective date is not 2015 because our consultant Ryan did not advise us that the effective date should be 2015. [...] DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 22, 2020 JUDGMENT AND REASONS: ZINN J.
-
99.
Domaines Pinnacle Inc. v. Beam Suntory Inc. - 2015 FC 680 - 2015-05-26
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 20150526 Docket: T-290-13 Citation: 2015 FC 680 Ottawa, Ontario, May 26, 2015 [...] (b) if the plaintiff fails to obtain judgment, the defendant is entitled to party-and-party costs to the date of the service of the offer and to costs calculated at double that rate, but not double disbursements, from that date to the date of judgment. [...] These are elements extrinsic to the final offer dated March 30, 2015.
-
100.
Loates v. The Queen - 2015 TCC 30 - 2015-02-06
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsDate: 20150212 Docket: 2012-1517(IT)G BETWEEN: M. BERNARD LOATES, [...] DATE OF HEARING: December 8, 2014 AMENDED REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: [...] DATE OF JUDGMENT: February 6, 2015 DATE OF AMENDED REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: