57,473 result(s)
-
126.
Babcock v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 280 - 2007-03-12
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 20070312 Docket: T-1170-06 Citation: 2007 FC 280 Ottawa, Ontario, March 12, 2007 [...] Please inform clients that fall within these categories of the expiry date. [...] DATE OF HEARING: December 12, 2006 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: SIMPSON J.
-
127.
Mathos v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2017 FC 1050 - 2017-11-17
Federal Court Decisions[4] The date on which that provision came into force clearly had to be specified if that date was not to be the date of royal assent (Interpretation Act, R.S.C., 1985, c I‑21, subsection 3(2)). [...] Only the date set by order in council applied. The cut‑off date of June 29, 2012, no longer applied, nor did the BRRA rule that created a “backlog.” [...] [7] Thus, an order in council dated August 15, 2012 (SI/2012‑65) set the coming‑into‑force date for the new section 36 as August 15, 2012.
-
128.
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2005 FC 137 - 2005-01-28
Federal Court DecisionsIn this case, the Board's interpretation means that the determinative date for s. 197 of the IRPA is the date of conviction, and not the date of the offence. [...] (a) whether the word 'breach' refers to the date of conviction or the date of commission; and [...] A plain and clear reading of the definition indicates that the appropriate date for the breach is the date of commission of the offence.
-
129.
Theaker v. Canada (Justice) - 2018 FC 662 - 2018-06-28
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 20180628 Docket: T-1643-15 Citation: 2018 FC 662 Ottawa, Ontario, June 28, 2018 [...] By Order dated June 14, 2016, the Court adjourned the hearing sine die. [...] DATED: June 28, 2018 APPEARANCES: Joy Theaker ON HER OWN BEHALF
-
130.
Diamant Elinor Inc. v. 88766 Canada Inc. - 2010 FC 1184 - 2010-11-25
Federal Court Decisions1. Mr. Sebag’s affidavit dated January 29, 2007, along with an invoice dated October 16, 2008, and a product information card bearing the mark attached as exhibits; [...] 1. Invoice 25602 dated August 19, 2005 2. Invoice 26226 dated November 23, 2005 [...] 3. Invoice 26522 dated January 10, 2006 4. Invoice 33976 dated September 18, 2008
-
131.
Swan v. Canada (Attorney General) - 1998-10-30
Federal Court of Appeal DecisionsDate: 19981030 Docket: A-648-97 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. ROBERTSON J.A. [...] The principal question before us is whether the date for valuing pension benefits is the date of divorce or the date that the actual division of pension benefits is effected. [...] He used the date of divorce, April 21, 1987, as the date on which to calculate the present value of Robichaud's pension benefits.
-
132.
Bab Holdings Inc. v. Big Apple Ltd. - 2002 FCT 72 - 2002-01-22
Federal Court Decisions[20]... The material date as of which the respondent must prove distinctiveness is the date of the filing of the Statement of Opposition (January 31, 1992). [...] There is some uncertainty in the jurisprudence concerning the appropriate date for the latter but I think the date that is generally accepted is the date of the filing of the opposition.... [...] [13] Since this is not an application by the applicant under subsection 12(2), the date set out in 12(2) is not the date to assess distinctiveness.
-
133.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada v. Apotex Inc. - 2017 FC 296 - 2017-03-21
Federal Court DecisionsB. The Relevant Date [56] The relevant date for assessing whether there was sufficient disclosure and whether utility had been demonstrated is the claim date of the patent, which in this case is the priority date: April 15, 1999. [...] B. The Relevant Date [127] The relevant date for determining whether the ‘898 Patent is obvious is the priority date: March 24, 2003. [...] It has an International Filing Date of April 12, 2000; and an international publication date of October 26, 2000.
-
134.
Stuart v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2010 FC 710 - 2010-06-29
Federal Court Decisionsat the Leclerc Institution dated July 31, 2009, concerning an application, dated July 24, 2009, with regard to the calculation of the applicant’s parole eligibility dates (establishing the applicant’s day parole eligibility date to be 2012-01-28 and the applicant’s full parole eligibility date to be 2015-01-18 for the [...] · Both the full parole eligibility date and the day parole eligibility date should be calculated as if there were one global sentence. [...] DATED: June 29, 2010 APPEARANCES: Michel Aubin Annie Sophie Bédard
-
135.
Golichenko v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 657 - 2016-06-14
Federal Court Decisions(I understand the term “lock in” date to be used by the parties to refer to the date an application is accepted for processing under the law as applicable at that date.) [...] Therefore, application dates are critical and cannot be altered just because an applicant submitted an incomplete application at an earlier date. [...] This analysis is also consistent with the Internal Guidelines’ reference to the lock-in date being the date that an application is determined to be complete.
-
136.
Redsand, Inc. v. Dylex Limited - 1997-06-10
Federal Court DecisionsThe material date with respect to this ground is that date of opposition, that is, June 14, 1990. [...] Here the appellant's trade-mark was not registered at the relevant date. [...] Thus, the appellant was under an initial evidentiary burden to establish: (i) use of its mark in Canada prior to the date of the respondent's filing and (ii) that it had not abandoned the mark, prior to date of advertisement in the Trade-marks Journal.
-
137.
Jost v. Canada (Governor in Council) - 2022 FC 1514 - 2022-11-09
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 20221109 Docket: T-382-22 Citation: 2022 FC 1514 Ottawa, Ontario, November 9, 2022 [...] DATE OF HEARING: WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ONLY ORDER AND REASONS: MOSLEY J. [...] DATED: november 9, 2022 WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS BY: BRENDAN M. MILLER
-
138.
Bouchard v. The Queen - 2013 TCC 31 - 2013-02-01
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsDate: 20130201 Docket: 2011-225(GST)I BETWEEN: MARIE BOUCHARD, [...] At the latest, she last ceased to be a director on May 20, 2007, when she resigned, and she has done nothing since that date, over two years before the assessment date. [...] The resolution that removes the appellant as a director and replaces her with Mr. Matte was dated retroactively to a date over two years before the assessment date.
-
139.
Castle Building Group Ltd. v. Canada (National Revenue) - 2021 FC 947 - 2021-09-15
Federal Court DecisionsCBS had outstanding returns on the date that the election was filed. With respect to the election dated December 12, 2016 with an effective date of December 1, 2016, we have accepted the election as it was filed on time. [...] [50] The Guidelines focus on the requested effective date for the 2017 Election (January 1, 2015); the Minister relies on the date of filing of the 2017 Election (February 22, 2017); and the Applicants argue that the determinative date should be the date of the Decision (December 18, 2019). [...] It is on that date that the Applicants requested discretionary relief from the provisions of the ETA. Accordingly, the date of filing is not an unreasonable date for the Minister to have selected.
-
140.
Pharmascience Inc. v. Canada (Health) - 2008 FC 922 - 2008-07-29
Federal Court DecisionsThis meant that, in this case, the date of the Invoice would serve as the cut off date. [...] NOC Date Submission No. Submission Date of Filing Reason for Submission [...] Patent Date of Filing Date Added The Prior NOCs Oct 3, 1993 08257
-
141.
Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis - 2014 FCA 68 - 2014-03-14
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions(ii) a date other than the certified date is more appropriate; and (b) ending on the date of the withdrawal, the discontinuance, the dismissal or the reversal. [...] (ii) soit qu’une date autre que la date attestée est plus appropriée; [...] It is only in circumstances where the Trial Judge deems that another date is more appropriate that this default date can be set aside.
-
142.
Johnston Family 1991 Trust v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue) - 1999-07-08
Federal Court DecisionsDate: 19990708 Docket: T-1769-98 BETWEEN: THE JOHNSTON FAMILY 1991 TRUST [...] 10. I remember marking the date 03/30/94 on my file copy of the Trust"s T3 as a notation of the date I mailed the T3 and the Elections. [...] 15. By letter dated January 15, 1998, Fed Masuch wrote to Revenue Canada and requested clarification of my letter dated January 2, 1998.
-
143.
Nasha Properties Ltd. v. The Queen - 1998-02-05
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsDate: 980205 Docket: APP-187-97-IT BETWEEN: NASHA PROPERTIES LTD., [...] [6]The letter from Revenue Canada to Nasha dated November 13, 1996 reads: [...] So that there is actually -- the actual date of the assessment, which in this particular instance the dates in question are the 10th August and 21st August.
-
144.
Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc. - 2007 FC 906 - 2007-09-12
Federal Court Decisions264. A judge or prothonotary who conducts a pre-trial conference shall fix the place of trial and assign a date for trial at the earliest practicable date after the pre-trial conference. [...] DATE OF HEARING: August 27, 2008 REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER: HARRINGTON J. [...] DATED: September 12, 2007 APPEARANCES: Mr. Gunars A. Gaikis Mr. Jeremy Want
-
145.
Servicemaster Company v. 385229 Ontario Ltd. (Masterclean Service Company) - 2014 FC 440 - 2014-05-07
Federal Court DecisionsA. The “coexistence without confusion” new evidence that post-dates the date of first use [...] [18] The Applicant directly challenges the Registrar’s findings on the relevance of evidence that post-dates the date of first use. [...] B. The “reputation” new evidence that pre-dates the date of first use
-
146.
Phelan v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2014 FC 56 - 2014-01-17
Federal Court DecisionsThe 2009 Application was duly completed and, therefore, the date of the 2009 Application was the effective date. [...] b) une date précédant de trois ans la date à laquelle la pension a été accordée au pensionné. [...] [54] The respondent submits that subsection 39(1) of the Pension Act provides two options for an effective date; the later of the date of the application or a date three years prior to the date of the decision.
-
147.
Kumar v. Canada - 2004 FCA 399 - 2004-11-25
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions(7) "Set-off action" letter dated September 8, 2003 (8) "Contempt of Court" motion dated May 25, 2004 [...] (9) "Affidavit of facts" dated June 29, 2004 (10) Order of TCC dated July 23, 2004 [...] (13) Letter of request to TCC dated August 13, 2004, for the date and time for the motion
-
148.
Canada v. H & M Farm Ltd. - 2021 FC 905 - 2021-08-31
Federal Court Decisions[...] When used to describe a date, it means generally in the time around the date specified. [...] The affidavit does not state that the posting date is the payment date. [...] [31] To summarize, the evidence does not reveal whether the “posting date” is the actual payment date.
-
149.
Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. v. Hospira Healthcare Corporation - 2009 FC 1077 - 2009-10-22
Federal Court DecisionsIt was submitted that the relevant date for construing the patent was the date of formal judgment and not an earlier date. [...] Here that date must be April 2, 2007, the date that the Notice of Allegation was served. [...] Merck, it is submitted, stands for the proposition that the date for assessing a patent in an NOC proceeding is the date of the hearing and not the date the NOA was served.
-
150.
Burlington Resources Finance Company v. The Queen - 2019 TCC 143 - 2019-07-09
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsThe Amended Motion is dated March 1st, 2019 and seeks the following relief: [...] My Orders dated August 3rd, 2017 and February 2nd, 2018 have therefore been satisfied. [...] DATE OF ORDER: July 9, 2019 APPEARANCES: Counsel for the Appellant: