Advanced Search

Canada v. Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited - 2016 FCA 130 - 2016-04-26

Fair Market Value (“FMV) of Shares Issued $17,237,740 $12,648,138.90   [...]  (i) the fair value of the property or past service in consideration of which the share is issued, or   [...]  (ii) that such property or past service has a fair value that is not less than the amount of money referred to in clause (a).

Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v. Witchekan Lake First Nation - 2023 FCA 105 - 2023-05-17

[51] The issue is whether the record is sufficient to allow the fair and just adjudication of the matter.   [...]  The Federal Court failed to consider this standard, along with its underpinning principles of proportionality and economy, in dealing with the motion for summary judgment before it.   [...]  A disposition does not have to be beyond doubt to be fair. Perfection in the record is not the standard.

Wewayakum Indian Band v. Wewayakai Indian Band - 1999-10-12

I deal, firstly, with the third and fourth arguments based upon section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.   [...]  In my respectful view the submissions of the appellants that the doctrine of fairness and the honour of the Crown are engaged in these appeals are wholly devoid of merit in the circumstances.   [...]  In light of my conclusions above, I find it unnecessary to deal with the equitable and statutory defences advanced by the Crown.

Mercer v. M.N.R. - 2003 TCC 652 - 2003-09-22

party to a transaction did or had the power to influence or exert control over the other and that the dealings of the parties are not consistent with the object and spirit of the provisions of the law and they do not demonstrate a fair participation in the ordinary operation of the economic forces of the market place.   [...]  (i) employment if the employer and employee are not dealing with each other at arm's length.   [...]  It is quite noteworthy that S. 5 of the Fishing Regulations which specifically deals with the Determination of Earnings of a fisher provides a complete scheme for doing so.

University of Alberta v. The Queen - 2015 TCC 336 - 2015-12-21

A GST registrant is entitled to use any method that is fair and reasonable provided it complies with the provisions of the Act.   [...]  An agreed statement of facts should deal only with facts, not the law.   [...]  However, since I am dealing with the acquisition of the Campus, the relevant subsection is 141.01(2).

Khosa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2023 FC 555 - 2023-04-17

The second concerns procedural fairness at the RPD hearing. A. Internal Flight Alternative   [...]  He claimed that both the RPD and the RAD concentrated on the first prong, and “did not at all deal with the second prong” of the IFA test.   [...]  He argued that the RAD erred by concluding that the RPD’s hearing was procedurally fair.

P. & S. Holdings Ltd. v. Canada - 2017 FCA 41 - 2017-03-01

[15] The Judge also found that the standard of review is correctness, given that the central issue to be resolved involves a question of procedural fairness.   [...]  Alternatively, the question arises as to whether the Judge could find that any common law duty of procedural fairness had been ousted by the regulatory scheme.   [...]  Specifically, they submit that she erroneously conflated the test for establishing the content of the duty of fairness and in determining the application of that duty.

Brown v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2023 FC 1748 - 2023-12-22

With regards to your question about sick leave, yes I believe I have a great deal of sick leave banked.   [...]  It only seems fair and reasonable that they be treated in the same way as physical illness related to Covid.   [...]  I simply ask for fairness to be treated in the same way. [40] The Applicant’s grievance was under the April 10, 2020 Direction.

Daniels v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2018 FC 463 - 2018-05-01

[30] The Applicant has raised three principal grounds of review and I will deal with each in turn.   [...]  In my view, a fair reading of Kanthasamy and the jurisprudence of this Court interpreting it, shows that there is no merit to the Applicants’ submission that the Officer applied a wrong or incorrect test.   [...]  [40] In my view, a reading of the Decision as a whole makes it clear that the Officer neither applies the wrong test in her BIOC analysis or deals with Isabella’s best interests through the lens of hardship.

Musqueam First Nation v. Canada - 2007 FC 1027 - 2007-10-05

In this regard we hope to deal directly and bilaterally with the Ministry and Canada to work out an accommodation amongst us.   [...]  The honour of the Crown is always at stake in its dealings with Aboriginal peoples: see for example R. v. Badger, ...; R. v. Marshall,... .   [...]  In all its dealings with Aboriginals peoples, from the assertion of sovereignty to the resolution of claims and the implementation of treaties, the Crown must act honourably.

Qazi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 288 - 2007-03-23

[13] On March 16, 2005, the applicant filed an application for judicial review of this negative PRRA decision on the grounds that he was denied procedural fairness and natural justice because of this undue delay in the delivery of the decision.   [...]  In the absence of any evidence demonstrating that the applicant has been prejudiced by the delay in providing him with the PRRA decision, I am unable to conclude that the applicant has been denied procedural fairness or natural justice.   [...]  [17] Because the single contested issue in this case deals with the alleged failure of the Officer to appropriately consider the best interests of the applicant’s three Canadian-born children, I deal below only with those relevant passages of the decision with direct or indirect reference to the best interests of the

Giroux v. Canada - 2000-12-04

This is, after all, an action for damages; we are not sitting as a selection board or an appeal board established under section 21 of the Public Service Employment Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. P-33, as amended; nor are we dealing with an application for judicial review of an appeal board decision.   [...]  [23] In summary, according to the plaintiff, we are therefore dealing with two series of delicts committed maliciously and in bad faith by servants of the Crown.   [...]  . . . 141. Therefore the plaintiff cannot fault Ms. Tremblay, whose submissions were based on the facts in evidence and constituted a necessary, fair and legitimate rebuttal of his submissions;

South Yukon Forest Corporation v. Canada - 2010 FC 495 - 2010-05-05

... I still feel it would only be fair that the truthfull story gets told.   [...]   that if you intend to impeach a witness you are bound, whilst he is in the box, to give him an opportunity of making any explanation which is open to him; and, as it seems to me, that is not only a rule of professional practice in the conduct of a case, but is essential to fair play and fair dealing with witnesses.   [...]  In the case at bar, Pilot acknowledges that an insurer is under a duty of good faith and fair dealing.