Advanced Search

Tahmourpour v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2010 FCA 192 - 2010-07-19

However, since I disagree with all but one of the conclusions reached by the judge, I do not consider it necessary to deal with this issue.   [...]  The Tribunal deals with this part of Mr. Tahmourpour’s complaint as follows at paragraphs 13 to 27 of its decision:   [...]  However, the Tribunal’s reasoning cannot be assessed fairly on the basis of paragraph 27 alone.

Birchcliff Energy Ltd. v. The Queen - 2015 TCC 232 - 2015-10-01

He was unable to point to any documentary evidence that the deal failed due to financing problems.   [...]  An individual, Mr. X, owns all the shares of a corporation (Lossco) which have a total fair market value of $100,000.   [...]  The source of this burden is the concept of “procedural fairness”. The taxpayer should know what case the taxpayer must meet.

Twizeyumukiza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2024 FC 974 - 2024-06-24

For the reasons that follow, I will not address the issues through the lens of procedural fairness.   [...]  I therefore find that the proceedings before the RAD did not have the effect of infringing the applicants’ rights of procedural fairness.   [...]  I cannot conclude that this is a new issue or that there has been a breach of procedural fairness.

Bayer Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2020 FC 750 - 2020-07-07

This means that the terms and conditions of commercial or financial transactions between related entities must be the same as those that would be obtained if the parties were dealing at arm’s length.   [...]  • B. Was the Requirement procedurally fair? • C. Was the Requirement reasonable?   [...]  The broad scope of the Requirement is more a question of reasonableness than procedural fairness.

Hehar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1054 - 2016-09-19

A: She is in the office dealing with a client on skype. Q: Can you call her on line [sic]?   [...]  The Applicant also says there were procedural fairness breaches in that the PFL was inadequate, and in the parallel interview process.   [...]  Issues of procedural fairness are reviewed on the correctness standard: Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Khosa, 2009 SCC 12 at para 43.

De Vazquez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2014 FC 530 - 2014-06-02

[25] Counsel for the Applicants argued that the Officer erred in relying on extrinsic evidence that was not full, fair and accurate, and breached procedural fairness by not giving the Applicants an opportunity to respond.   [...]  In that context, the Officer’s findings with respect to Argentina’s educational system and its capacity to deal with special needs, was superfluous, to the extent that the issue was not even raised by the Applicants.   [...]  It will be accepted only when issues of procedural fairness are at stake and, if so, when the information is necessary.

Takeda Canada Inc. v. Canada (Health) - 2011 FC 1444 - 2011-12-09

(b) Did the Minister breach a duty of fairness owed to the Applicant in refusing to consider the data submitted?   [...]  [43] Given the conclusion reached on Issue A, it is unnecessary for me to deal extensively with the Applicant’s argument that fairness was denied by not considering the nature of the data submitted.   [...]  In addition, I do not find that there was any breach of the duty of fairness owed to the Applicants.

Bourdiert v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 475 - 2007-05-03

However, the Board did agree to receive a letter from the bank with which the applicant was dealing, which the applicant’s counsel filed out of time, considering the date that the document was prepared, namely August 16, 2006.   [...]  [21] The second issue involves procedural fairness, for which there is no applicable standard.   [...]  It is also not disputed that any breach of procedural fairness will invalidate the decision.

Thiara v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 1997-03-06

A preliminary challenge to the Board's decision is based on the applicant's submission that the panel erred in law in failing to provide a fair hearing.   [...]  In my view, reviewing the transcript as a whole, particularly that portion including his direct examination, I conclude that the applicant was denied a fair hearing.   [...]  In the circumstances here, it seems to me that the applicant and his counsel were not given a full and fair opportunity to present the case.

Williams v. Cisco Systems, Inc. - 2019 FC 116 - 2019-01-28

That Cisco used the words “IT Essentials”, in its dealings with Google entities or other entities operating or administering internet search engines, in such a manner as to influence them to steer traffic to Cisco’s website; and   [...]  [36] In deciding whether pleadings are “manageable and fair”, the Court should consider the whole of the circumstances, including the relative knowledge and means of knowledge of the parties.   [...]  [37] The statement at paragraph 19 of Mancuso that “The pleading must tell the defendant who, when, where, how and what gave rise to its liability” must be understood in light of the “manageable and fair” requirement.

Huruglica v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2014 FC 799 - 2014-08-22

(c) to grant, as a fundamental expression of Canada’s humanitarian ideals, fair consideration to those who come to Canada claiming persecution;   [...]  c) de faire bénéficier ceux qui fuient la persécution d’une procédure équitable reflétant les idéaux humanitaires du Canada;   [...]  • the role of the RAD was to ensure a fair and efficient adjudication and that refugee protection be granted where appropriate.

Capri Interiors Ltd. v. M.N.R. - 2004 TCC 23 - 2004-02-03

d) Laurin was hired as a foreman and his duties included overseeing job sites, supervising workers, delivering materials and dealing with general contractors; (Agreed)   [...]  Generally speaking, the workers found Henry Funk to be very fair and accepted what he offered; sometimes they negotiated for different rates.)   [...]  On the whole, this witness displayed a great deal of independence, very much being his own man and not tied in at all with Capri.

Massey v. Canada - 1997-06-10

The Notice is of a hearing into alleged improper conduct by members of the RCMP in dealing with labour unrest at the Yellowknife Giant Mine strike and lockout in June of 1992.   [...]  The genesis of the Commission was a need for an independent review authority so that members of the public, with complaints against the RCMP, might perceive that such complaints are properly handled by an independent review authority, an authority that would deal with such complaints in an objective, open and fair manner, a  [...]  Certainly the Commission has a great deal of discretion as to whether to hold a hearing, but the Plaintiffs say that the hearing was held against all of the tenor of the evidence and for the wrong reasons.