Advanced Search

Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Canada (Minister of Health) - 2004 FC 1334 - 2004-09-29

b) de faire état du Transfert dans tout document public ou toute publicité sur les services de santé assurés et les services complémentaires de santé dans la province.   [...]  [37] Sections 14 and 15 of the Act, submits the respondent, deal with a political process that involves inter-governmental consultation, a discretionary decision of the Minister based on such consultation and the possibility of referral of the matter to the Governor in Council.   [...]  Chief Justice Scott's reasoning was followed by Hunter J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court in Brown v. British Columbia (Attorney General) (1997), 41 B.C.L.R. (3d) 265, [1998] 5 W.W.R. 312, a case dealing with a cap on health insurance benefits for treatment outside Canada.

Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2013 FC 918 - 2013-08-30

The respondent submits that the Alliance therefore cannot claim that its procedural fairness rights were violated.   [...]  Thus, the violation of the Alliance’s procedural fairness rights may well have impacted the Minister’s decision.   [...]  The Alliance stresses that the requirement of section 2 of the PSLRA that the Minister designated under the Act not be a member of Treasury Board highlights the need for independence of the Minister and establishes a requirement that he deal at arms length from the Employer.

Hydro- Québec v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2024 FC 669 - 2024-05-08

[64] The AGC replies that there was no breach of procedural fairness.   [...]  [74] In terms of fairness, the Supreme Court of Canada emphasized in Baker that:   [...]  [131] The Court will therefore set aside the disputed portion of the Minister’s Delegate’s Decision, i.e., the portion dealing with meters in non-Indigenous territory, and remit the matter for redetermination, with respect to these meters, by a different decision-maker.

Paradis Honey Ltd. v. Canada - 2015 FCA 89 - 2015-04-08

[54] These reasons deal with the issue of proximity arising from the course of conduct between the parties.   [...]  [68] The source of the difficulty in dealing with this claim is that while it is framed as an action in negligence, all of the particulars of negligence are acts for which a remedy is available in administrative law.   [...]  [87] First, in my view, the Federal Court erred in dealing with the beekeepers’ allegation that Canada pursued an improper purpose or acted in bad faith in creating and implementing the blanket guideline.

Fagan v. The Queen - 2011 TCC 523 - 2011-12-14

[57] The appellant argues that subsections 66(12.6) to 66(12.75) of the Act provide a complete code for dealing with resource expense renouncement and reduction.   [...]  (c) a person with whom the person was not dealing at arm's length, the following rules apply:   [...]  The learned Trial Judge held that the Minister was obliged to apply the policy as so stated "in a fair and even handed manner".

Canadian Council for Refugees v. Canada - 2007 FC 1262 - 2007-11-29

The essential function engaged in dealing with the issues are within the domain and expertise of a court.   [...]  He has a great deal of expertise with international refugee law, and at one time served as a judge at an appeal level dealing with immigration and asylum law.   [...]  (b) David Martin has worked in the U.S. government dealing with refugee issues for many years.

Canada v. Bezan Cattle Corporation - 2023 FCA 95 - 2023-05-09

The Federal Court was satisfied that it had the evidence necessary to adjudicate the dispute fairly and justly on the record.   [...]  It deals with application of payments made by a farmer where a mortgage (or security agreement) secures more than one debt.   [...]  (2) Every Act and regulation is to be construed as being remedial and is to be given the fair, large and liberal interpretation that best ensures the attainment of its objects.

Canada (National Revenue) v. Hydro-Québec - 2018 FC 622 - 2018-06-15

Given that subsections 231.2(3) and 289(3), which deal with this judicial authorization, refer to subsection 1 of these respective sections, I am reproducing the text of section 231.2 in its entirety:   [...]  [31] A review of the earlier case law could shed some light on the scope of subsection 231.2(3), a fairly recent creation.   [...]  Naturally, it deals with the collection of tax debts, the keeping of accounts and records.

Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Cobra Fixations Cie Ltée. - Cobra Anchors Co. Ltd. - 2002 FCT 829 - 2002-07-29

In fairness to counsel, this argument was not explicitly raised before me and no authority was cited to that effect.   [...]  (b) Adherence to the language of the claims in turn promotes both fairness and predictability.   [...]  One assumes that class 128/92 deals with something other than the subject matter of class 411.

Johnson v. Canadian Tennis Association - 2024 FC 404 - 2024-03-08

However, as other judicial officers have noted, the Plaintiff here has “already been accorded a great deal of latitude but he persists in deliberately flouting Orders and Directions of the Court” Order of Case Management Judge Catherine A. Coughlan dated November 8, 2023 at para 21.   [...]  Nor is it clear that costs will be awarded based on the high end of Column V. I agree with the Moving Defendants that the amount of security must fairly balance the “need for the security to provide meaningful indemnity and not be illusory, while also not being so oppressive so as to prevent a plaintiff from bringing a

Singh v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2022 FC 346 - 2022-03-14

As she had never made an investment before Ms. Singh took $41,000 from the house sale proceeds and sought advice from her bank as to how she might best deal with the money.   [...]  [23] The Supreme Court of Canada has established that when conducting judicial review of the merits of an administrative decision, other than a review related to a breach of natural justice and/or the duty of procedural fairness, the presumptive standard of review is reasonableness: Canada (Minister of Citizenship and

Conseil des Innus de Pessamit v. Riverin - 2017 FC 343 - 2017-04-05

Furthermore, the question of determining whether the Prothonotary’s decision is fair or not constitutes a question of mixed fact and law that results in the application of the standard of palpable and overriding error.   [...]  An administrative assistant at its attorneys’ office who was dealing with personal problems recorded the deadline as January 23 instead of January 16, 2017.

Cerisier v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 1315 - 2016-11-28

[13] The applicant also criticized the RPD for having breached the rules of procedural fairness by failing to provide advance notice of its intention to use its specialized knowledge in connection with the medical certificate that she submitted as evidence.   [...]  Since I have already concluded that the RPD’s decision was reasonable, I do not find it necessary to deal with this issue since it cannot on its own, even assuming it to be well-founded, invalidate that decision.