Advanced Search

Proctor & Gamble Inc. v. John Doe - 2000-01-06

Rather, he relied on the dealings between Scotti and Usher. The relationship between Usher and Mario Ruffo (the supplier of the counterfeit products) is supported by documents obtained as a result of the Anton Piller Order.   [...]  However, fairness to those whose property is seized under the authority of an order of this Court requires that their interests also receive consideration, at least to the extent of demonstrating objective need for the court"s intervention.

Canada v. Mercier - 1996-11-15

Barring the odd exception, it is the factor which applies, and is applied, most commonly, conveniently and fairly to the proper determination of the family unit for benefit-allocation purposes.   [...]  In my view, in light of the current economic situation in which the government must reduce its expenditures and increase its revenues to deal with the deficit, there is no doubt that the government was justified in making the choice it made.

Reddy Cheminor Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2003 FCT 542 - 2003-05-14

It contains sections dealing with the filing of information and material, the screening of information and material, the evaluation of submissions, re-filed submissions, the appeal process and drug evaluation fees.   [...]  I do not propose to deal further with this question since, in my view, the application can be determined on the basis of the arguments advanced in relation to the issues delineated above.   [...]  p) autoriser que soit faite auprès du grand public de la publicité relative à des moyens anticonceptionnels et des drogues fabriquées ou vendues pour servir à prévenir la conception, ou présentées comme telles, et déterminer les circonstances et les conditions dans lesquelles ces moyens et ces drogues peuvent faire l'objet

Mowi Canada West Inc. v. Canada (Fisheries, Oceans and Coast Guard) - 2021 FC 700 - 2021-07-02

The 1.5 million fish will have been culled and the Minister will have achieved the objective of her decision while having dodged procedural fairness, reasonableness and the reviewing powers of this Court.   [...]  3. A declaration that the Constraining Decision was made in a manner contrary to the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.   [...]  [124] And, when discussing the balance of convenience aspect of the tripartite test, Justice Pamel noted that Canada had argued that a stay of the component of the Minister’s Decision dealing with transfer licences would harm reconciliation efforts with First Nations.

Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Telus Corporation - 2024 FCA 126 - 2024-08-06

The companion appeal deals with claims in one of the same Patents in issue on this appeal, the 870 Patent, and with a different patent (Canadian Patent No. 2,730,344).   [...]  According to the Court, the respondents behaved responsibly in their dealings with Rovi and their conduct was beyond reproach: Federal Court Decision at para. 635.   [...]  On a fair reading of paragraph 400, the Federal Court was simply introducing the concept of the “Restart” function and spoke about the 585 Patent generally, much like Mr. Wahlers did in his testimony.

Robertson v. Beauvais - 2014 FC 208 - 2014-03-04

(4) Elle a compétence concurrente, en première instance, dans les procédures visant à régler les différends mettant en cause la Couronne à propos d’une obligation réelle ou éventuelle pouvant faire l’objet de demandes contradictoires.   [...]  [84] In dealing with this issue, Justice Wilson stated as follows at para 21 of Roberts:   [...]  [94] Thus, while the foregoing cases support the conclusion that I do possess jurisdiction to award the damages claimed, they deal with the issue only tangentially.

Ali v. The Queen - 2006 TCC 287 - 2006-05-18

[70] Counsel for the appellants decided not to pursue either argument during oral argument and consequently I do not propose to deal with them in these reasons.   [...]  [74] I would note, however, that this Court often deals with circumstances where the tax results in individual cases are harsh - this ground alone is not sufficient to invalidate the legislation.   [...]  [122] First, the pharmacist-recording requirement limits the scope of the provision to fairly well-defined parameters to what are commonly referred to as prescription drugs and other substances that can only be obtained through a pharmacist.

Roy v. R. - 2002 FCT 233 - 2002-03-01

[49] Since the plaintiffs have a direct interest in this case, I do not need to deal with the arguments that were made with respect to public interest standing.   [...]  In other words, we are dealing here with a targeted ameliorative program which is alleged to be underinclusive, rather than a more comprehensive ameliorative program alleged to be underinclusive.   [...]  The defendant argued that the apportionment formula is pressing and substantial because there has to be a means of dividing up the benefit in a way that it does not affect other plan members by giving too much money out, and which is fair to the two individuals.

Construction and Specialized Workers' Union, Local 1611 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2013 FC 512 - 2013-05-21

As the decision of the Court will deal only with the grounds of review invoked by the applicant, the relevance of the documents requested must necessarily be determined in relation to the grounds of review set forth in the originating notice of motion and the affidavit filed by the applicant.   [...]  As noted earlier, I will deal with the various issues raised by the Applicants within the context of these six factors, to the extent that this can be done in an orderly way.   [...]  In other words, that somebody in subsequent dealings with the company may review that and bring those back up.

Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Bell Canada - 2022 FC 1388 - 2022-10-24

Q. And the invention was the creation of the provisional application, is that fair?   [...]  [447] There was a great deal of development in the area of TV distribution.   [...]  Q. You had less than a month to go before the five years expired, is that fair?

Wasylynuk v. Canada (Royal Mounted Police) - 2020 FC 962 - 2020-10-14

[3] The Commissioner of the RCMP has quashed the applicant’s medical discharge because he was not afforded procedural fairness.   [...]  The Commissioner concluded that Cpl. Wasylynuk’s right to procedural fairness had been breached.   [...]  It is convenient to deal with the mandamus point now, and address prematurity issues later.

Canada v. Bombardier Inc. - 2012 FCA 46 - 2012-02-08

[7] Before dealing with the issues and the parties’ submissions, a brief summary of the facts is in order to better illustrate the problem.   [...]  [16] The relevant legislative provisions are paragraphs 12(1)(a) and 20(1)(m) and sections 181 to 181.2(6) of the Act, which deal with elements to be included in the income and taxable capital of a large corporation under Part 1.3.   [...]   d’une banque ou d’une compagnie d’assurance tenue par la loi de faire rapport au surintendant, ou par le surintendant des assurances ou un autre agent ou autorité semblable de la province où elle est constituée, s’il s’agit d’une compagnie d’assurance tenue par la loi de faire rapport à cet agent ou à cette autorité.

Toussaint v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 873 - 2009-09-04

Given the importance of having a proper factual foundation before the Court upon which to make important Charter determinations, I will not deal extensively with LIFT’s arguments in these Reasons for Judgment.   [...]  1. Does the law, program or activity, based on a personal characteristic, impose differential treatment between the claimant and others with whom the claimant may fairly claim equality?   [...]  In a case of this kind, and when deciding whether so called economic discrimination could possibly be read into the ambit of s. 15(1), it is well to keep in mind that almost any law dealing with sales or income taxes, licence fees, tariffs or social benefits will have a different and more adverse impact on some groups of