Advanced Search

Highlands Fuel Delivery G.P. v. Canada - 2019 FC 1163 - 2019-09-11

Highlands also pointed out that the Minister has an obligation to act fairly and honestly because the burden to refute assumptions is on the taxpayer.   [...]  For the relevant periods, there is no written agreement between the federal government and the Province of New Brunswick dealing with taxation.

Walsh v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2017 FC 451 - 2017-05-08

He also contends that the duty of procedural fairness owed to him by the Commission was breached in various ways.   [...]  [10] As that restriction was lifted in October 2012, the Commission first thought there was no need to deal with the Applicant’s complaint.

Yansane v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 277 - 2016-03-03

[19] ...By exception, a direction is appropriate where it is required to guide the parties or the Registry in matters of procedure, or to deal with a matter to which the parties have consented or that for other reasons may reasonably be considered not to be controversial.   [...]  e. Denial of Fair Public Trial Although the constitution and law provide for the judiciary's independence, judicial authorities routinely deferred to executive authorities in politically sensitive cases.

Fournier Pharma Inc. v. Canada (Health) - 2013 FC 862 - 2013-08-12

Counsel contended that paragraph 1 of the subsequent Reasons for Order and Order dated September 25, 2012, makes it clear that the Costs Order only deals with the eight issues in dispute between the parties, those issues enumerated in the Costs Order.   [...]  Fournier submits a more fair and reasonable approach would be to limit the assessment of Sandoz’ travel fees such that one counsel be entitled to one general meeting with an expert, and then once more for defending that expert’s cross-examination.

Canada v. Johnson - 2012 FCA 253 - 2012-10-04

The Canada Revenue Agency audited 132 of the participants, and concluded that 32 of them had profited from their dealings with Mr. Lech.   [...]  In the hope of avoiding controversy and potential litigation, the majority shareholder offered to purchase the shares of all minority shareholders for an amount exceeding their fair market value.

Abbott Laboratories v. Canada (Health) - 2008 FC 352 - 2008-03-18

[...] [29] This appeal deals with the propriety of a patent listing.   [...]   first party attempts to assert a claim which could have been resolved in an earlier case, such situations will be fairly rare in NOC proceedings for the reasons I have earlier stated – most notably because it is the generic’s NOA followed by the exchange of evidence that will determine the justiciable issues in each case.

Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc. v. Canada (Health) - 2007 FC 545 - 2007-05-24

While not specifically dealing with the jurisprudence on administrative decisions not supporting an addition to the Register, it received indirect favorable comment from Justice Binnie who wrote the Court’s reasons, (see paragraphs 5 and 19).   [...]  (3) Sous réserve du paragraphe (4), la personne qui soumet une liste de brevets doit le faire au moment du dépôt de la demande d’avis de conformité

Thériault v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2006 FC 1070 - 2006-09-08

ou la modifier s’il constate que les conclusions sur les faits ou l’interprétation du droit étaient erronées; il peut aussi le faire sur demande si l’auteur de la demande allègue que les conclusions sur les faits ou l’interprétation du droit étaient erronées ou si de nouveaux éléments de preuve lui sont présentés.   [...]  As in Moar, the Board was obliged, in my view, to make an explicit finding that this medical evidence in support of the applicant’s claim was not credible, or to solicit its own medical evidence dealing with the issue of a stress etiology, or to accept the uncontradicted evidence of the applicant in rendering its decision

Axa Canada Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue) - 2006 FC 17 - 2006-01-09

23. (2) Sur recommandation du ministre compétent, le gouverneur en conseil peut faire remise de toutes taxes ou pénalités, ainsi que des intérêts afférents, s’il estime que leur perception ou leur exécution forcée est déraisonnable ou injuste ou que, d’une façon générale, l’intérêt public justifie la remise.   [...]  After some hard negotiating, we concluded the following deal with AXA CANADA in respect of our audit of management fees . . .

Bouchard v. The Queen - 2003 TCC 701 - 2003-10-28

(t) the Appellant signed an Independent Agent Agreement (the "Agreement") with the Payer dated August 17, 2000; (Agreed) (She deals with this in her evidence that I review below.)   [...]  Having said that, it is also fair to say that where the parties genuinely choose a particular method of setting up their working arrangement, it is not for the Minister or this Court to disregard that choice.

Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v. Boutiques Cliquot Ltée. - 2003 FCT 103 - 2003-01-30

c) faire passer d'autres marchandises ou services pour ceux qui sont commandés ou demandés . . .   [...]  [99] I will deal with each of these grounds. [100] Paragraphs 12(1)(d) and 18(1)(a) of the Act indicate that registration of a trade mark is invalid if the mark creates confusion with a registered trade mark:

Magnowski v. The Queen - 2000-06-01

When it was obvious to me that there was not going to be a fair assessment of the issues, I felt I had no choice but to proceed to the next step.   [...]  [75] Subsection 18(2) of the Act deals with situations where interest is paid on a debt relating to the acquisition of land, when the land is not used in the business, but is held for resale or development.

Millette v. The Queen - 1999-01-22

Moreover, there is no evidence as to the fair market value of the immovable.   [...]  However, we are dealing here with an appeal from an assessment, and the applicable rules are those concerning appeals.