Tax Court of Canada Judgments

Decision Information

Vallis v. The Queen

Court (s) Database Tax Court of Canada Judgments
Date 2007-06-28
Neutral citation 2007 TCC 420
File numbers 2006-2801(GST)I
Judges and Taxing Officers Wyman W. Webb
Subjects Part IX of the Excise Tax Act (GST)

Decision Content

 

 

 

 

Docket: 2006-2801(GST)I

BETWEEN:

DWAYNE VALLIS,

Appellant,

and

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

Respondent.

 

____________________________________________________________________

Appeal heard on June 28, 2007 at Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

 

Before: The Honourable Justice Wyman W. Webb

 

Appearances:

 

For the Appellant:

The Appellant himself

Counsel for the Respondent:

Lindsay D. Holland

 

____________________________________________________________________

 

JUDGMENT

The appeal from the Notice of Assessment No. 05161503112370003 dated July 4, 2005 made under the Excise Tax Act, is dismissed in accordance with the attached Reasons for Judgment.

 

                                                                                                   

       Signed at Halifax, Nova Scotia, this 18th day of July, 2007.

 

 

"Wyman W. Webb"

Webb, J.

 

 

 

 

 

Citation: 2007TCC420

Date: 20070718

Docket: 2006-2801(GST)I

BETWEEN:

DWAYNE VALLIS,

Appellant,

and

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

Respondent.

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

 

Webb, J.

 

[1]   There was no dispute in relation to the facts in this case. The Appellant acknowledges and agrees that the construction of his house was substantially completed on or before July 21, 2000 and that he and his spouse occupied this house at that time. The Appellant did not submit a signed rebate application form to claim the new housing rebate in relation to the construction of his house until June 9, 2005.

 

[2]   Subsection 256(3) of the Excise Tax Act provides in part as follows:

 

A rebate under this section in respect of a residential complex shall not be paid to an individual unless the individual files an application for the rebate within two years after the earliest of

 

(a) the day that is two years after the day the complex is first occupied as described in subparagraph (2)(d)(i),

 

…

 

(b) the day construction or substantial renovation of the complex is substantially completed.

[3]   Since the construction of the house was substantially completed by July 21, 2000, the rebate application would have had to have been submitted within two years of that date and since it was not submitted until 2005, this is more than two years after the date that the house was substantially completed.

 

[4]   As a result, the appeal is dismissed without costs.

 

 

       Signed at Halifax, Nova Scotia this 18th day of July, 2007.

 

 

"Wyman W. Webb"

Webb, J.

 

CITATION:                                       2007TCC420

 

COURT FILE NO.:                            2006-2801(GST)I

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          Dwayne Vallis v. The Queen

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Halifax, Nova Scotia

 

DATE OF HEARING:                       June 28, 2007

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:    The Honourable Justice Wyman W. Webb

 

DATE OF JUDGMENT:                    July 18, 2007

 

APPEARANCES:

 

For the Appellant:

The Appellant himself

Counsel for the Respondent:

Lindsay D. Holland

 

COUNSEL OF RECORD:

 

       For the Appellant:

 

                          Name:                     

 

                            Firm:

 

       For the Respondent:                    John H. Sims, Q.C.

                                                          Deputy Attorney General of Canada

                                                          Ottawa, Canada

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.