11,317 result(s)
-
5,426.
Ralph v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2009 FC 1274 - 2009-12-11
Federal Court Decisions[22] In my opinion, the present application does not raise any issues of procedural fairness or questions of law. [...] (a) The Board will consider only those licensing appeals which deal with policies for vessels less than 19.7m (65’) LOA. [...] (i) determining if the appellant was treated fairly in accordance with the Department’s licensing policies, practices and procedures;
-
5,427.
Ndererehe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 880 - 2007-09-04
Federal Court DecisionsI appreciate that the officer deals with many applications; some 500 a year. [...] I find that in providing no substantive reasons for her decision, the officer denied the applicants procedural fairness. [...] [35] I agree with the respondent that a breach of procedural fairness or other legal error will not alone constitute special reasons for awarding costs.
-
5,428.
Abdeli v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) - 2006 FC 1047 - 2006-08-31
Federal Court DecisionsIssue No. 1: Did the visa officer breach her duty of procedural fairness by failing to provide [...] 18. The applicant submits the officer breached procedural fairness by failing to provide adequate reasons. [...] [22] In this case, we are dealing with a later case where Parliament has intended that the earlier factual findings of the CRDD must be adopted by the immigration officer.
-
5,429.
Esquega v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2005 FC 1097 - 2005-08-10
Federal Court Decisions[16] I deal with two preliminary matters raised by counsel for the Respondent. [...] (1) The process leading up to the making of the Order–in-Council was flawed because it breached the principles of natural justice or procedural fairness. [...] [24] Counsel for the Respondent did not seriously challenge the factual underpinning to the Applicant’s fairness argument.
-
5,430.
McKeating v. The Queen - 2004 TCC 99 - 2004-02-24
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsThe Minister, in the Reply, stated no application under the fairness provisions had been made. [...] As stated, the Minister has the discretion to do this under the fairness provisions. [...] That said, it is acknowledged that it is beyond my jurisdiction to deal with the collection of taxes owing.
-
5,431.
Bellegarde v. Carry the Kettle First Nation - 2024 FC 699 - 2024-05-07
Federal Court Decisions(4) Procedural fairness and bias 60 (5) Was the Decision otherwise unreasonable? [...] of the reviewing court on procedural fairness issues is simply to determine whether the procedure that was followed was fair, having regard to the particular circumstances of the case: “The ultimate question remains whether the applicant knew the case to meet and had a full and fair chance to respond” (at paras 54, 56). [...] [66] More recently, in Shanks, Justice McDonald analyzed whether the Federal Court had jurisdiction to review a First Nation council resolution dealing with per capita distribution payments from a treaty settlement agreement.
-
5,432.
Canada (Attorney General) v. Telbani - 2014 FC 1050 - 2014-09-19
Federal Court DecisionsI will deal with the last two questions as part of my summary of the principles that will guide me in reviewing the Attorney General’s application, while addressing the role of the amici in the introduction to my remarks. [...] The extent and reliability of the information gathered by the Service would be diminished, and its capacity to identify and deal with potential threats would be compromised. [...] However, to prevent such measures from being taken for no reason and prevent judges from wrongly ruling that the fairness of the trial would be compromised because he or she is dealing with an incomplete file, Parliament provided a mechanism allowing disclosure of information that could be useful to ensure a fair trial to
-
5,433.
Saleh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2024 FC 988 - 2024-06-25
Federal Court DecisionsDid the Officer breach their duty of fairness by failing to disclose the NSSD assessment to the Applicant? [...] The question of procedural fairness is determined on a standard equivalent to correctness (Velimirovic v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1156 at para 13; Ahmed at para 24). [...] [40] The Board, through the RPD, is mandated to consider questions of risk, as referenced in the Act, when dealing with a claim for protection.
-
5,434.
Canadian Constitution Foundation v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2022 FC 1232 - 2022-08-26
Federal Court DecisionsDeclaring a Public Order Emergency, P.C. 2022-0106, SOR/2022-20 (the “Proclamation”), pursuant to s. 17(1) of the Emergencies Act, RSC 1985, c 22 (4th Supp) (the “Act”), declaring that a public order emergency existed throughout Canada which necessitated special temporary measures for dealing with the emergency. [...] a) l’objet de la modification est de faire concorder le document avec les questions en litige à l’audience; [...] Ultimately, it boils down to a consideration of simple fairness, common sense and the interest that the courts have that justice be done”: Continental Bank at 302.
-
5,435.
Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v. Pasqua First Nation - 2018 FCA 141 - 2018-07-26
Federal Court of Appeal DecisionsRather, it is an important tool in settling these outstanding treaty land entitlements in an orderly and fair way as agreed by the parties to the agreement. [...] Rather, the honour of the Crown requires that the Crown adhere to and implement the terms of the agreement in an open and fair manner (Wewaykum). [...] Given this finding, it is not necessary to deal with issue 2, namely, whether there is an abuse of process.
-
5,436.
Hillman v. The Queen - 2018 TCC 122 - 2018-06-29
Tax Court of Canada Judgments[6] The Minister’s assessment position is that the Appellant engaged in a “RRSP strip scheme” whereby an amount of funds in her RRSP was used to buy shares in a Canadian corporation which shares were not qualified for RRSP purchase and these shares were not acquired at fair market value and the majority of the supposedly so [...] In my view this is enough to conclude that it would not be fair to allow the proposed question to go forward. [...] That is not surprising, as typically issues of income tax liability per interpretation of the Act are litigated in this Court while a provincial superior court having criminal jurisdiction would deal with tax matters, as here, through the lens of Criminal Code charges as to tax evasion, fraud and the like.
-
5,437.
Desjardins v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2017 FC 847 - 2017-09-21
Federal Court DecisionsFifth, although the applicant was interviewed in May 2016 and was able to make submissions concerning the preliminary report dated August 12, 2016, the Commissioner did not comply with the principles of natural justice or procedural fairness. [...] Alternatively, the applicant is seeking an order declaring that the Commissioner did not comply with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness or the procedure that he was required to follow under the Act. [...] In his previous case report, tabled in Parliament in February 2017, the Commissioner criticized the former President of the Agency and the former Vice-President of Human Resources for having committed wrongdoings by not fairly and fully dealing with the harassment complaints in question.
-
5,438.
Sidhu v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2016 FC 891 - 2016-08-02
Federal Court DecisionsAt that time, the applicant was employed as a lead station attendant dealing with cargo. [...] [11] At the opening of the hearing, applicant’s counsel indicated to the Court that the issue of procedural fairness raised in the applicant’s memorandum of fact and law should now be included in the grounds of attack respecting the reasonableness of the impugned decision. [...] Be that as it may, it is clear to the Court, after a careful examination of the totality of the record, that the applicant was afforded procedural fairness.
-
5,439.
Csoka v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 653 - 2016-06-13
Federal Court Decisions[13] Questions of procedural fairness are reviewable by this Court against the standard of correctness (Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Khosa, 2009 SCC 12 at para 43; Mission Institution v Khela, 2014 SCC 24 at para 79). [...] The Officer's failure to do so in this case constitutes a breach of procedural fairness. [...] [27] The Officer does not address the Applicants’ evidence that their former boss is now an influential member of the far right Jobbik party and mayor of their hometown, and that he has formed a private militia to deal with Roma.
-
5,440.
Husian v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 462 - 2016-04-22
Federal Court Decisions3. Did the RAD breach natural justice or procedural fairness? IV. Standard of Review [...] [23] The RAD placed a great deal of importance on the dates when the Applicant and his father had resided in Somalia, yet this was not determinative for the purposes of Article 2 of Somalia’s citizenship law. [...] It was seemingly intent to find fault with whatever was presented rather than to take a fair and reasonable view of the material provided.
-
5,441.
Ntakirutimana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2016 FC 272 - 2016-03-04
Federal Court Decisions[2] Given that these two cases deal with related facts and similar issues, I will address them both in a single judgment, which will be recorded in each of the files. [...] [6] The applicants feel that the Officer made an unreasonable decision that was contrary to the principles of procedural fairness, by failing to consider the insecurity of their refugee status in South Africa, which is still subject to renewal and which can only be made permanent through certification by an administrative [...] Nor have they convinced me that the issue for which they criticized the Officer is a procedural fairness issue.
-
5,442.
McCartie v. Canada (National Revenue) - 2015 FC 222 - 2015-02-23
Federal Court DecisionsHe argues that the CRA does not have the authority to unilaterally register an individual involuntarily for GST and he asserts that this violates natural justice, due process of law and procedural fairness. [...] While this ordeal deals with the same GST debt owed by him, the actions taken by the CRA were separate and distinct. [...] The compulsion which is without regard for procedural fairness and natural justice is in violation of s. 7 and by way of s. 26 of the Charter and s. 1(a) and 2(e) of the Bill?
-
5,443.
Goldman Holdings Ltd. v. The Queen - 2011 TCC 256 - 2011-05-18
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsAccording to his Affidavit[1], the Auditor assumed the following facts in respect of the Partnership’s ownership and inventory of land and its fair market value: [...] 8. The fact that I assumed with respect to the fair market value of the land owned by the Partnership was: [...] (i) the fair market value of the real property immediately prior to the dissolution of the Partnership was not less that $24,220,500.
-
5,444.
Tampopo Garden Ltd v. M.N.R. - 2011 TCC 110 - 2011-02-18
Tax Court of Canada JudgmentsThey have determined what was fair in distribution of tips. Not the company or employer. [...] [8] The Intervenor’s (Heva Ng) major concern appears to revolve around whether the tip sharing arrangement was fair which has no bearing on the issue. [...] Is it fair for the servers & bussers to be under tipped or even not getting any tips after they have strived for excellent service?
-
5,445.
Conseil des Innus de Pessamit v. Association des policiers et policières de Pessamit - 2010 FCA 306 - 2010-11-12
Federal Court of Appeal DecisionsOn a completely different note, the applicant submitted that the fact that it had been given the reasons of the CIRB [translation] “the day before the deadline for applying for judicial review” (Applicant’s Memorandum at para. 110) and that the hearing had not been recorded were prejudicial breaches of procedural fairness. [...] [22] To determine whether one is dealing with such an activity (Pamajewon at para. 25), [...] PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS [31] The applicant alleged that the rules of procedural fairness were breached because, first, there was no transcript or recording of the hearing before the CIRB and, second, it received the reasons for the decision the day before the expiration of the deadline to appeal.
-
5,446.
Boiko v. Grover - 2009 FC 1291 - 2009-12-18
Federal Court DecisionsExtrinsic evidence may be accepted only on issues of jurisdiction or procedural fairness (see e.g. Alberta Wilderness Assn. v. Canada (Minister of Environment), 2009 FC 710, [2009] F.C.J. No. 876 at par. 30). [...] Thus the Applicant faults the Commission for not having met with Phil Chodos, an internal investigator for the NRC who was familiar with the Applicant’s allegations and had, according the Applicant, a great deal of relevant evidence. [...] In any case, the Commission had no grounds to investigate the matter, and its alleged failure to do so cannot be said to be a breach of its duty of fairness.
-
5,447.
Abuali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 221 - 2009-03-03
Federal Court DecisionsSince this is essentially a matter of procedural fairness, the standard of correctness will apply. [...] (a) immediately, if the claimant is present at the hearing and the Division considers that it is fair to do so; or [...] [20] Rules 31 to 35 deal with the manner of providing a document. Rule 35 is relevant to the within matter and provides as follows:
-
5,448.
Ramos Meneses v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 179 - 2007-02-16
Federal Court DecisionsAs was clarified by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian Union of Public Employees (C.U.P.E.) v. Ontario (Minister of Labour), 2003 SCC 29, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 539 the pragmatic and functional approach need not be applied to questions of procedural fairness. [...] The tribunal did not breach procedural fairness by choosing to indicate that the case turned on the issue of state protection, and by proceeding to focus on and analyze that particular issue in its decision. [...] It relied primarily on excerpts from one document dealing with the year 2001.
-
5,449.
Randall v. Caldwell First Nation of Point Pelee and Pelee Island Band Council - 2006 FC 1054 - 2006-08-31
Federal Court Decisions[11] Notwithstanding being privy during the mediation to information exchanged between the parties on a without prejudice basis for the purpose of settlement negotiations, as well as the parties’ confidential interests and positions, the parties jointly requested that I deal with the present motion because of my intimate [...] Where success has been fairly evenly divided, however, there should normally be no order as to costs: Lubrizol Corp. v. Imperial Oil Ltd. (1996), 67 C.P.R. (3d) 1 (F.C.A.) at 25. [...] We signed the agreement in principle and in good faith, on the understanding that the next election will be open, transparent and fair and will occur soon after the Band approves a new code.
-
5,450.
Charkaoui, Re - 2006 FC 410 - 2006-03-30
Federal Court Decisions(c) the judge shall deal with all matters as informally and expeditiously as the circumstances and considerations of fairness and natural justice permit; [...] f) ces renseignements ou éléments de preuve doivent être remis aux ministres et ne peuvent servir de fondement à l'affaire soit si le juge décide qu'ils ne sont pas pertinents ou, l'étant, devraient faire partie du résumé, soit en cas de retrait de la demande; [...] g) si le juge décide qu'ils sont pertinents, mais que leur divulgation porterait atteinte à la sécurité nationale ou à celle d'autrui, ils ne peuvent faire partie du résumé, mais peuvent servir de fondement à l'affaire;