11,312 result(s)
-
8,801.
Mortensen v. The Queen - 2010 TCC 164 - 2010-09-14
Tax Court of Canada Judgmentsc. Fairness dictates the original result should not be binding in the new context. [...] In reviewing the decision, I have noted that Justice Daniel did not consider or deal with any of the expenses that may have been incurred by the Appellant when he earned the commission income in 1997 and 1998.
-
8,802.
Gravel v. Telus Communications Inc. - 2010 FC 596 - 2010-06-01
Federal Court DecisionsIt is relevant to note that the applicant deals the same way with his version of the facts related to this material at paragraphs 1–8 and 23 of his affidavit; these paragraphs were not struck by Tremblay-Lamer J. In the interests of fairness, the paragraphs of Mr. Sarault’s affidavit must not be struck.
-
8,803.
Mortensen v. The Queen - 2010 TCC 177 - 2010-03-30
Tax Court of Canada Judgmentsc. Fairness dictates the original result should not be binding in the new context. [...] [20] I must also deal with the question of delay. [21] Counsel for the Respondent also said that it is the Crown’s position that in the interest of finality, consistency and economy of judicial resources, that issue estoppel should simply apply to prevent the relitigating of amounts now 13 years old (Transcript, page 21,
-
8,804.
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Nguyen - 2010 FC 219 - 2010-02-24
Federal Court Decisions[19] Whether the IAD failed to provide adequate reasons for its conclusion is an issue of procedural fairness, which is to be reviewed on a standard of correctness. [...] [32] In dealing with this matter upon return for reconsideration the IAD should take note of this advice from the Respondent and proceed accordingly.
-
8,805.
Canada (Attorney General) v. Quadrini - 2010 FCA 47 - 2010-02-17
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions[20] Finally, I must deal with two procedural matters. Firstly the respondent has listed eleven issues to be determined on the stay motion (see paragraph 23 of his Motion Record). [...] Quest for the Truth, Finality and Fairness 20. [...] 21. [...] 22. [...]
-
8,806.
Lopez Diaz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2010 FC 131 - 2010-02-09
Federal Court DecisionsFurther, the argument presented by the applicant does not justify the reopening under rule 55 of the Rules of Practice because they deal with an interpretation of the facts and law of the case. [...] [13] Counsel for the Minister emphasizes that the original decision of the Refugee Protection Division was unquestionably fair.
-
8,807.
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Kang - 2009 FC 941 - 2009-09-21
Federal Court DecisionsHe relies on this Court’s decision in Aslam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 FC 514, [2004] F.C.J. No. 620 (QL) where it was held that procedural rules should be interpreted and applied in a way that does not compromise the right to a full and fair hearing. [...] [26] The Respondent also relies on sections 57 and 58 of the Immigration Appeal Division Rules which allow the IAD to deal with matters arising during appeals for which there are no provisions as it sees fit and to act on its own initiative and vary certain procedural requirements, in arguing that the IAD can appoint a
-
8,808.
Guzman v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) - 2009 FC 899 - 2009-09-11
Federal Court Decisions[9] While Dr. Sirota, Ph.D. in psychology, recommended he take part in counselling sessions, there was no evidence of such treatment, which one would expect if the applicant was ready to deal with this fully. [...] [20] The applicant submits that the IAD must be guided by the Ribic factors and that the member failed to balance them in a fair manner.
-
8,809.
Igbo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2009 FC 305 - 2009-03-23
Federal Court DecisionsGiven the numerous credibility concerns identified above and the objectivity of the IRB’s Research Directorate, I prefer the objective documentation (including the lack of any indication that MASSOB members are violent in dealing with dissident Ibos) to the subjective testimony of this claimant. [...] On a fair reading of the transcript I am hard to put to say that there is more than the possibility of a minor inconsistency in the evidence.
-
8,810.
Netbored Inc. v. Avery Holdings Inc. - 2008 FC 756 - 2008-06-18
Federal Court DecisionsNo issue of procedural fairness arises from the Prothonotary’s decision in this case that might justify the reception of fresh evidence: Ontario Assn. of Architects v. Assn. of Architectural Technologists of Ontario, 2002 FCA 218, 291 N.R.61 at para. 30. [...] The appellants were content to rely upon Netbored to deal with the issues in this action until it appeared that the corporate shield might be pierced.
-
8,811.
Guerra Rivera v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 862 - 2007-08-29
Federal Court DecisionsI thus find the SIO’s notes to be a fairly accurate and reliable rendition of the claimant’s response when asked by the SIO to describe the claimant’s fear in El Salvador. [...] Having seen the claimant dressed like a woman at his hearing and carefully examining the various photographs (above noted) it is apparent to me that the photographic evidence would not lead me to conclude that I was dealing with either a homosexual or a cross-dresser.
-
8,812.
Dimonekene v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) - 2007 FC 675 - 2007-06-25
Federal Court DecisionsFirst, the question dealing with the meaning to be given to the definition of “dependent child” is purely a question of law, while the second question involving the assessment of the facts particular to Canthe’s story is a question of fact. [...] I note as well that, in the federal legislative context, this Court’s preferred approach is buttressed by s. 12 of the Interpretation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-21, which provides that every enactment “is deemed remedial, and shall be given such fair, large and liberal construction and interpretation as best ensures the
-
8,813.
Society for reproduction of rights of authors, composers and publishers in Canada inc. v. Hotel des encans de Montreal inc. - 2007 FC 604 - 2007-06-06
Federal Court Decisions• - That the respondent’s actions are justified by the fair dealing exceptions provided for in the Act;
-
8,814.
Solvay Pharma Inc. v. Apotex Inc. - 2007 FC 407 - 2007-04-17
Federal Court DecisionsThe court has a clear duty to deal with an application expeditiously. [...] But when deciding whether the failure to act in conformity with the time limits should be held against a party, regard must be had to all the facts with a view to ensuring the parties are treated fairly.
-
8,815.
Fairmont Hotels Inc. v. Canada (Corporations) - 2007 FC 95 - 2007-01-29
Federal Court DecisionsIt would be unfair, for example, to refuse to intervene when the underlying decision denies a party the benefit of a fair hearing, discloses grounds for an apprehension of bias, or curtails a party’s substantive rights: Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada 3000 Airlines Ltd. (re Nijjar), [1999] F.C.J. No. 725 [...] · The Director’s decision to deal with FRP’s application while the trade-mark proceedings are ongoing indicates that the Director plans to arrive at a decision without taking account of FH’s ownership of the “Fairmont” trade-marks.
-
8,816.
Gan v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) - 2006 FC 1329 - 2006-11-02
Federal Court DecisionsWhile the characterization of some of this evidence as “evasive” seems somewhat harsh, it is not a conclusion that can be fairly described as irrational or totally unsupported by evidence. [...] It is true that artful pleaders can find any number of errors when dealing with decisions of administrative tribunals.
-
8,817.
Gauthier v. M.N.R. - 2006 TCC 537 - 2006-10-24
Tax Court of Canada Judgments[3] The Minister determined that the Appellant was not employed in insurable employment under a contract of service, but that even if she had been, her employment would be excluded from insurable employment under paragraph 5(2)(i) of the Employment Insurance Act ("the Act") because she and the payor were not dealing with [...] On balance, the evidence tends to show that during the periods in issue, the Appellant and her employer made an arrangement one of the fundamental objectives of which was to secure the maximum amount of employment insurance benefits for the Appellant, as opposed to paying the Appellant fair value for her work.
-
8,818.
Donkor v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2006 FC 1089 - 2006-09-12
Federal Court Decisions[25] Counsel for the applicant fairly conceded that there were discrepancies in certain of the applicant’s and Ms. Beshir’s responses during their interviews. [...] [27] In this case, the officer’s reasons dealing with whether there are humanitarian and compassionate grounds to allow the applicant to remain in Canada are extensive.
-
8,819.
Film City Entertainment Ltd. v. John Doe - 2006 FC 980 - 2006-08-14
Federal Court DecisionsI will not deal with the defendant’s remaining arguments. [16] There shall be no order as to costs. [...] . . . 189. (1) Le défendeur qui fait valoir contre le demandeur un droit de réparation peut, au lieu d'intenter une action distincte, faire une demande reconventionnelle.
-
8,820.
Stevenson v. The Queen - 2006 TCC 54 - 2006-07-20
Tax Court of Canada Judgments[23] The other witness who did appear was the accountant's spouse, and she testified ably, fairly and her evidence was straightforward as far as the Court is concerned. [...] [40] They do not have to be indebtedness arising from direct dealings between the corporation and the persons connected with the shareholders.
-
8,821.
Arreola de la Cruz v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2006 FC 512 - 2006-04-26
Federal Court Decisions[15] In a further memorandum of argument filed after leave on this application for leave and for judicial review was granted, counsel raised on behalf of the Applicants the issue of whether or not the RPD denied fairness or natural justice to the Applicants in conducting the hearing before it on the basis of “reverse order [...] [16] I will deal first, and briefly, with the issue of reverse order questioning.
-
8,822.
Brown v. Canada (Attorney General) - 2006 FC 463 - 2006-04-10
Federal Court DecisionsNot only did he not offer any support for his contention, but it seems to me that having this sort of information readily available is especially important where, as in this case, Mr. Brown is serving a lengthy sentence, and may be required to deal with a variety of Correctional Service personnel over the life of his [...] [36] Moreover, there is a duty on the National Parole Board to act fairly, and to base its decisions on reliable information: Canada v. Zarzour, 153 C.C.C. (3d) 284, at ¶ 27.
-
8,823.
Mahmood v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2005 FC 1526 - 2005-11-09
Federal Court DecisionsS'il ne peut le faire, il en donne la raison et indique quelles mesures il a prises pour s'en procurer. [...] However, the making of such a broad statement cannot obviate the Board=s obligation to deal expressly in its reasons with documentary evidence which is important and relevant to a key element of the claim, namely whether the Applicant was submitted to torture while in detention, and which evidence supports a conclusion that
-
8,824.
Comeau v. Canada (Customs and Revenue Agency) - 2005 FCA 271 - 2005-08-10
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions. . . the Minister’s designated representatives did not exercise the Minister’s discretionary power reasonably and fairly and arbitrarily rejected the grounds set out in the applicant’s application to reduce interest. [...] At this stage in the analysis, the Court of Appeal is dealing with appellate review of a subordinate court, not judicial review of an administrative decision.
-
8,825.
Hausleitner v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2005 FC 641 - 2005-05-06
Federal Court DecisionsAs a consequence, I propose to deal with both issues together. Standard of Review [...] The officer quite fairly noted the aspects of the articles that would tend to support the applicants'position, as well as those aspects of the same articles that supported the finding that effective state protection was available to victims of organized crime in Hungary.